From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2TInKCJUhpm for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:14:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ea0-f178.google.com (mail-ea0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 21:14:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ea0-f178.google.com with SMTP id d13so2238927eaa.37 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <508EE395.9010709@ursulin.net> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:14:13 +0000 From: Tvrtko Ursulin MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50830D33.5050807@ursulin.net> <5083C61C.5090807@gmail.com> <5083E4A8.3060501@ursulin.net> <5083E87B.2080908@gmail.com> <5083EC61.8070505@ursulin.net> <50844D01.9090805@gmail.com> <5084551E.5040304@ursulin.net> <508ED985.5060301@ursulin.net> <508EDD6E.7030908@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <508EDD6E.7030908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] cryptsetup not working under 3.6 - regression from 3.4? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Milan Broz Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, okozina@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/10/12 19:47, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/29/2012 08:31 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> Just tried 3.6.4 and it is still broken. Is there anything else I could >> try to debug this? > > See response from response from Ondra on dmcrypt list - your kernel config > is perhaps broken. I don't think that reached me - perhaps I was not copied. Weird yes, I mean no one can spot anything bad with my config... > Please use fresh checkout, run make oldconfig and try again. > (Many people use 3.6 already and there is no other report.) ... and I just used it today to configure a fresh 3.6.4 (plus -rt10 patches) without a problem. Unless RT patchset is the culprit. Hm.. that would be unexpected, but I guess it is worth a shot. I'll let you know what happens without -rt. Thanks, Tvrtko