From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2PvEdrhtTnK for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:08:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:08:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.16]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M68YO-1SsHVZ3n0k-00y8aT for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:08:19 +0100 Message-ID: <50D34600.6030002@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:08:16 +0100 From: Markus Krainz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50D334DD.1060407@gmx.at> <20121220160534.GD11558@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20121220160534.GD11558@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [Off topic] Re: Fwd: saout.de mailing list memberships reminder List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alasdair G Kergon Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de Am 20.12.2012 17:05, schrieb Alasdair G Kergon: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 04:55:09PM +0100, Markus Krainz wrote: >> I think the forwarded message speeks for itself :) > And your point is? > > It's a compromise that seems to work pretty well for all sorts of reasons amply > debated elsewhere. > > Similarly, the mailing list manager doesn't require every message to be GPG > signed yet the lists don't fill with forged email. > > Alasdair It just seems odd that I get about 10 of those from various lists every month. Why would you even store your users passwords in clear text an email it periodicly? This just seems like an idiotic idea. You're right, this is probably not the place to discuss this. Do you have a link to where this is debated? Best, Markus > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@saout.de > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt >