From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id avlL9j6V6KfN for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
 Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:31:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com (mail-ea0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.215.169])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:31:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id a12so4654238eaa.14
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50DF7D3D.9030504@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:31:09 +0100
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <50DF635C.90003@gmail.com> <20121229231515.GA6503@citd.de>
In-Reply-To: <20121229231515.GA6503@citd.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 1.6.0-rc1
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
Cc: dm-crypt <dm-crypt@saout.de>

On 12/30/2012 12:15 AM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:

> Are you sure (about AES-NI)?

I meant difference in ecryption/decryption speed, not real
numbers (it was an example from virtual machine and
in 32bit mode in fact).

Yes, speed should be much higher on recent systems.

At least it motivates people to try it :)

When you are playing with it: you can try to
unload/blackist various kernel modules
(aesni_intel, aes_x86_64, ...) and check difference.

Milan