From: "msalists@gmx.net" <msalists@gmx.net>
To: "dm-crypt@saout.de" <dm-crypt@saout.de>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Asustor NAS and cryptsetup 1.6.1
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:18:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A2EC7E.7030201@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141230100413.GA11208@tansi.org>
They are reluctant to give out any details, but are saying that they
will be releasing a new version of their software in the coming weeks
that uses ecryptfs instead.
Is this a step forward or backward (or rather just "sideways")?
Mark
On 2014-12-30 02:04, Arno Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 03:32:58 CET, msalists@gmx.net wrote:
>> On 2014-12-29 11:29, Quentin Lefebvre wrote:
>>> On 29/12/2014 20:06, msalists@gmx.net wrote :
>>>> Assuming I did create the container with aes-cbc-essiv:sha256; would
>>>> cryptsetup automatically figure out the correct parameters when it is
>>>> subsequently called without those parameters to mount the container?
>>>> Or do non-default parameters at creation time require the same
>>>> non-default parameters again for subsequent mounts?
>>> As you may have understood, in plain mode, there is no header, so
>>> no way for cryptsetup to guess the algorithm used. Thus, if it is
>>> a non-default one, it must be specified also at mount time.
>>>
>> Hm, makes sense. Is there some kind of a config file that I could
>> specify the parameters in, and that would be read prior to using the
>> defaults - similar to how some parameters for mount can be specified
>> in /etc/fstab ?
> Only if the NAS-makers added one. cryptsetup does not have
> a mechanism for this.
>
> Arno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-27 7:47 [dm-crypt] Asustor NAS and cryptsetup 1.6.1 msalists
2014-12-27 10:11 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-29 19:06 ` msalists
2014-12-29 19:29 ` Quentin Lefebvre
2014-12-30 2:32 ` msalists
[not found] ` <20141230100413.GA11208@tansi.org>
2014-12-30 18:18 ` msalists [this message]
2014-12-30 19:16 ` Sven Eschenberg
2014-12-31 7:26 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-30 0:37 ` Claudio Moretti
2014-12-30 1:00 ` msalists
2014-12-30 1:46 ` Arno Wagner
2014-12-30 2:11 ` msalists
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-27 3:49 msalists
2014-12-27 7:38 ` Arno Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A2EC7E.7030201@gmx.net \
--to=msalists@gmx.net \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox