From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8ho4O2KaxFs for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 20:00:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from stringer.orebokech.com (stringer.orebokech.com [88.190.240.207]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 20:00:46 +0100 (CET) From: Romain Francoise References: <50DF635C.90003@gmail.com> <50E6C1EC.1000307@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:55:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50E6C1EC.1000307@gmail.com> (Milan Broz's message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:50:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87sj6gn5g7.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Switch to XTS mode for LUKS in cryptsetup in 1.6.0 (Was Re: [ANNOUNCE] cryptsetup 1.6.0-rc1) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Milan Broz Cc: dm-crypt Milan Broz writes: > Any serious objections to not do that now? How does it compare to cbc in terms of (real-world) performance?