From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7irHgcDlGRH for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:42:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:42:07 +0100 (CET) From: Andi Kleen References: <51501C0A.5060406@digadd.de> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 03:32:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <51501C0A.5060406@digadd.de> (Christian Schmidt's message of "Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:42:34 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] kworkers for dm-crypt locked to CPU core 0? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Schmidt Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Schmidt writes: > > Is there a way I can make the scheduler put those on multiple cores? Submit the IO from multiple cores. Don't use dd. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only