* [PATCH] DM RAID: Clean-up handling of 'rebuild' device requests
@ 2011-11-28 20:01 Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-28 20:18 ` Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-29 23:27 ` [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: 'rebuild' parameter code should be setting MD_CHANGE_DEVS Jonathan Brassow
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Brassow @ 2011-11-28 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dm-devel
dm-raid: Change the way the 'rebuild' parameter is processed.
1) We already allowed the rebuild flag to clear the superblock area for a
device. There is no reason to shame the user if they didn't clear the
superblock area ahead of time. Change the message to simply print-out
that it is clearing the superblock for the purpose of a rebuild.
2) Set the 'FirstUse' flag in 'super_load' vs 'super_init_validation'. This
allows the devices that had 'rebuild' set to be processed like a new device.
3) Since the rebuild devices are processed like new devices, the MD_CHANGE_DEVS
flag also gets set on the MD device. This was a necessary missing action
that forces the new superblock to be written when the array is instantiated.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
===================================================================
--- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ static int super_load(struct md_rdev *rd
return ret;
sb = page_address(rdev->sb_page);
- if (sb->magic != cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC)) {
+
+ /*
+ * Two cases that we want to write new superblocks and rebuild:
+ * 1) New device (no matching magic number)
+ * 2) Device specified for rebuild (!In_sync w/ offset == 0)
+ */
+ if ((sb->magic != cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC)) ||
+ (!test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) && !rdev->recovery_offset)) {
super_sync(rdev->mddev, rdev);
set_bit(FirstUse, &rdev->flags);
@@ -743,12 +750,9 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct
* recovery_cp must be MaxSector.
*/
rdev_for_each(r, t, mddev) {
- if (!test_bit(In_sync, &r->flags)) {
- if (!test_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags))
- DMERR("Superblock area of "
- "rebuild device %d should have been "
- "cleared.", r->raid_disk);
- set_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags);
+ if (!test_bit(In_sync, &r->flags))
+ DMINFO("Device %d specified for rebuild: "
+ "Clearing superblock", r->raid_disk);
rebuilds++;
} else if (test_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags))
new_devs++;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] DM RAID: Clean-up handling of 'rebuild' device requests
2011-11-28 20:01 [PATCH] DM RAID: Clean-up handling of 'rebuild' device requests Jonathan Brassow
@ 2011-11-28 20:18 ` Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-29 23:27 ` [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: 'rebuild' parameter code should be setting MD_CHANGE_DEVS Jonathan Brassow
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Brassow @ 2011-11-28 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: device-mapper development
On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Jonathan Brassow wrote:
> dm-raid: Change the way the 'rebuild' parameter is processed.
> rdev_for_each(r, t, mddev) {
> - if (!test_bit(In_sync, &r->flags)) {
> - if (!test_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags))
> - DMERR("Superblock area of "
> - "rebuild device %d should have been "
> - "cleared.", r->raid_disk);
> - set_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags);
> + if (!test_bit(In_sync, &r->flags))
Missing '{' - will resend.
brassow
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: 'rebuild' parameter code should be setting MD_CHANGE_DEVS
2011-11-28 20:01 [PATCH] DM RAID: Clean-up handling of 'rebuild' device requests Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-28 20:18 ` Jonathan Brassow
@ 2011-11-29 23:27 ` Jonathan Brassow
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Brassow @ 2011-11-29 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dm-devel
Changes from previous:
- Add missing '{'
- Change comments to emphasize bug fix
brassow
dm-raid: 'rebuild' parameter code should be setting MD_CHANGE_DEVS
The 'rebuild' parameter is used to rebuild individual devices in an array.
(Resynchronize a RAID1 device or recalculate a parity device in higher RAID,
for example.) The MD_CHANGE_DEVS flag must be set when this parameter is
given in order to write out the superblocks and make the change take immediate
effect.
So, we need MD_CHANGE_DEVS to be set and the 'FirstUse' flag was being set as
a special case for rebuilds in super_init_validation. The code that handles
new devices in super_load already sets MD_CHANGE_DEVS and 'FirstUse'. Adding
a condition for rebuilds in super_load takes care of both flags without a need
for the special case in 'super_init_validation'.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
===================================================================
--- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -667,7 +667,14 @@ static int super_load(struct md_rdev *rd
return ret;
sb = page_address(rdev->sb_page);
- if (sb->magic != cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC)) {
+
+ /*
+ * Two cases that we want to write new superblocks and rebuild:
+ * 1) New device (no matching magic number)
+ * 2) Device specified for rebuild (!In_sync w/ offset == 0)
+ */
+ if ((sb->magic != cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC)) ||
+ (!test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) && !rdev->recovery_offset)) {
super_sync(rdev->mddev, rdev);
set_bit(FirstUse, &rdev->flags);
@@ -744,11 +751,8 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct
*/
rdev_for_each(r, t, mddev) {
if (!test_bit(In_sync, &r->flags)) {
- if (!test_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags))
- DMERR("Superblock area of "
- "rebuild device %d should have been "
- "cleared.", r->raid_disk);
- set_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags);
+ DMINFO("Device %d specified for rebuild: "
+ "Clearing superblock", r->raid_disk);
rebuilds++;
} else if (test_bit(FirstUse, &r->flags))
new_devs++;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-29 23:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-28 20:01 [PATCH] DM RAID: Clean-up handling of 'rebuild' device requests Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-28 20:18 ` Jonathan Brassow
2011-11-29 23:27 ` [PATCH - v2] DM RAID: 'rebuild' parameter code should be setting MD_CHANGE_DEVS Jonathan Brassow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).