From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
vijay.chauhan@netapp.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] block: do not artificially constrain max_sectors for stacking drivers
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:39:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343781553-17089-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120710191859.GB3831@redhat.com>
blk_set_stacking_limits is intended to allow stacking drivers to build
up the limits of the stacked device based on the underlying devices'
limits. But defaulting 'max_sectors' to BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024)
doesn't allow the stacking driver to inherit a max_sectors larger than
1024 -- due to blk_stack_limits' use of min_not_zero.
It is now clear that this artificial limit is getting in the way so
change blk_set_stacking_limits's max_sectors to UINT_MAX (which allows
stacking drivers like dm-multipath to inherit 'max_sectors' from the
underlying paths).
Reported-by: Vijay Chauhan <vijay.chauhan@netapp.com>
Tested-by: Vijay Chauhan <vijay.chauhan@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index d3234fc..565a678 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -143,8 +143,7 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
lim->discard_zeroes_data = 1;
lim->max_segments = USHRT_MAX;
lim->max_hw_sectors = UINT_MAX;
-
- lim->max_sectors = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
+ lim->max_sectors = UINT_MAX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits);
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 17:59 [PATCH] DM MULTIPATH: Allow dm to send larger request if underlying device set to larger max_sectors value Chauhan, Vijay
2012-07-09 1:01 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-07-09 12:34 ` Chauhan, Vijay
2012-07-09 13:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-07-09 13:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-07-09 13:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-07-09 14:14 ` [PATCH] block: do not artificially constrain max_sectors for stacking drivers Mike Snitzer
2012-07-09 14:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Snitzer
2012-07-09 22:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-07-10 19:10 ` Chauhan, Vijay
2012-07-10 19:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-08-01 0:39 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2012-08-01 8:45 ` [RESEND PATCH] " Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343781553-17089-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vijay.chauhan@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).