Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:42:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505511774.2705.3.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170915164456.9803-6-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 00:44 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +static void save_path_queue_depth(struct pgpath *p)
> +{
> +	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(p->path.dev->bdev);
> +
> +	p->old_nr_requests = q->nr_requests;
> +	p->queue_depth = q->queue_depth;
> +
> +	/* one extra request for making the pipeline full */
> +	if (p->queue_depth)
> +		blk_update_nr_requests(q, p->queue_depth + 1);
> +}

blk_mq_init_allocated_queue() initializes nr_requests to the tag set queue depth.
Does that mean that the above code increases nr_requests by one? If so, does
that change only result in a performance improvement for the queue depth
mentioned in the path description (3)? Sorry but I doubt that this change will
yield a significant improvement for higher queue depths. Does that mean that
this patch can be left out?

Thanks,

Bart.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-15 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 16:44 [PATCH 0/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19  5:43         ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36           ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56             ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04               ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49                 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55                   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42                     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44                       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25                         ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50                           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20  1:13                             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20  1:19                   ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48           ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52             ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03               ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07             ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:06     ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:48       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 13:23       ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 14:41         ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:56           ` Ming Lei
2017-09-17 12:51     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm-mpath: remove annoying message of 'blk_get_request() returned -11' Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: export blk_update_nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 20:10   ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1505511774.2705.3.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox