From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: Revert "dm mpath: remove unnecessary NVMe branching
 in favor of scsi_dh checks"
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:10:59 +0000
Message-ID: <1520961057.2638.22.camel@wdc.com>
References: <20180312202808.3556-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
	<20180312212314.GA30763@redhat.com> <1520890358.3469.68.camel@wdc.com>
	<20180313012346.GA31673@redhat.com> <1520959432.2638.17.camel@wdc.com>
	<20180313170210.GD2785@redhat.com> <20180313170721.GA3262@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180313170721.GA3262@redhat.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-ID: <985AE7F345E0394497510258DCFF7CD5@namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 13:07 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Just a thought: Maybe dm-4.16 (rc4 based) is missing a blk-mq fix?
> 
> Might be worth cherry-picking the 2 topmost commits from dm-4.16 into
> the linus-based (rc5) tree you reported the original issue against?
> 
> (looking at jens' rc5 block pull request, it seems unlikely but...)

Hello Mike,

Even if that would be the case, that can't have been the cause of what I
reported. Before I run any dm tests I merge the block layer, SCSI and RDMA
changes that are scheduled for the next kernel version into the dm tree.

Bart.