* [PATCH] dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices
@ 2025-06-13 23:08 Benjamin Marzinski
2025-06-17 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Marzinski @ 2025-06-13 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka, Mike Snitzer; +Cc: dm-devel
Due to the semantics of iterate_devices(), the current code allows a
request-based dm table as long as it includes one request-stackable
device. It is supposed to only allow tables where there are no
non-request-stackable devices.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
index 9f95f77687ef..d91207b2d77f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
@@ -898,17 +898,17 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t,
return true;
}
-static int device_is_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
- sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
+static int device_is_not_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
+ sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
{
struct block_device *bdev = dev->bdev;
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
/* request-based cannot stack on partitions! */
if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
- return false;
+ return true;
- return queue_is_mq(q);
+ return !queue_is_mq(q);
}
static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
/* Non-request-stackable devices can't be used for request-based dm */
if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
- !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
+ ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_not_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
DMERR("table load rejected: including non-request-stackable devices");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices
2025-06-13 23:08 [PATCH] dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices Benjamin Marzinski
@ 2025-06-17 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-06-23 9:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Snitzer @ 2025-06-17 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Marzinski; +Cc: Mikulas Patocka, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:08:52PM -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Due to the semantics of iterate_devices(), the current code allows a
> request-based dm table as long as it includes one request-stackable
> device. It is supposed to only allow tables where there are no
> non-request-stackable devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Amazing this type of bug is still lurking, thought I audited all of
the iterate_devices callout functions.. anyway, thanks for fixing it!
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> index 9f95f77687ef..d91207b2d77f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> @@ -898,17 +898,17 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static int device_is_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> - sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> +static int device_is_not_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> + sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = dev->bdev;
> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>
> /* request-based cannot stack on partitions! */
> if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
> - return false;
> + return true;
>
> - return queue_is_mq(q);
> + return !queue_is_mq(q);
> }
>
> static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
> @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
>
> /* Non-request-stackable devices can't be used for request-based dm */
> if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
> - !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
> + ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_not_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
> DMERR("table load rejected: including non-request-stackable devices");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices
2025-06-17 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
@ 2025-06-23 9:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2025-06-23 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Snitzer; +Cc: Benjamin Marzinski, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:08:52PM -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > Due to the semantics of iterate_devices(), the current code allows a
> > request-based dm table as long as it includes one request-stackable
> > device. It is supposed to only allow tables where there are no
> > non-request-stackable devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
>
> Amazing this type of bug is still lurking, thought I audited all of
> the iterate_devices callout functions.. anyway, thanks for fixing it!
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
I've applied the patch, thanks.
Mikulas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-23 9:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-13 23:08 [PATCH] dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices Benjamin Marzinski
2025-06-17 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-06-23 9:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).