From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guan Junxiong Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] libmultipath: path latency: fix default base num Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 10:19:57 +0800 Message-ID: <1f0d7fa6-df44-331d-e9ef-d50da51c5723@huawei.com> References: <20171118001134.26622-1-mwilck@suse.com> <20171118001134.26622-2-mwilck@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171118001134.26622-2-mwilck@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Martin Wilck , Christophe Varoqui Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, niuhaoxin , "Shenhong (C)" List-Id: dm-devel.ids It looks good. Reviewed-by: Guan Junxiong On 2017/11/18 8:11, Martin Wilck wrote: > I don't think anyone can measure latency to 1% accuracy. It's > better to not even pretend to be able to. 10% should be fine > even for the most latency-critical environments. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck > --- > libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > index 9d5397ec1b3a..b8c5bc7c50a4 100644 > --- a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > +++ b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ > #define DEF_IO_NUM 100 > > #define MAX_BASE_NUM 10 > -#define MIN_BASE_NUM 1.01 > -#define DEF_BASE_NUM 1.5 > +#define MIN_BASE_NUM 1.1 > +// This is 10**(1/4). 4 prio steps correspond to a factor of 10. > +#define DEF_BASE_NUM 1.77827941004 > > #define MAX_AVG_LATENCY 100000000. /* Unit: us */ > #define MIN_AVG_LATENCY 1. /* Unit: us */ >