From: malahal@us.ibm.com
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] a deadlock bug in the kernel-side device mapper code
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:24:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109222425.GA3577@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091109175730.GA12556@us.ibm.com>
malahal@us.ibm.com [malahal@us.ibm.com] wrote:
> dm_get_from_kobject() seems to be a culprit though. It checks
> DMF_FREEING without a lock and then calls dm_get. Here is an untested
> patch. Made on top of _name_read_lock patch.
Found another place where the lock is not held correctly. This is an
update to my previous patch [dmf_freeing_lock.patch]
Description:
There are places where the code checks for DMF_FREEING bit flag and
conditionally calls dm_get(). This should be done under _minor_lock,
otherwise there is no point in checking for the bit flag.
Signed-off-by: malahal@us.ibm.com
diff -r e4c5c66b9a17 drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
--- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c Mon Nov 09 13:38:38 2009 -0800
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c Mon Nov 09 14:21:13 2009 -0800
@@ -1595,7 +1595,6 @@
if (!md)
return -ENXIO;
- dm_get(md);
mutex_lock(&_name_read_lock);
hc = dm_get_mdptr(md);
if (!hc || hc->md != md) {
@@ -1610,7 +1609,6 @@
out:
mutex_unlock(&_name_read_lock);
- dm_put(md);
return r;
}
diff -r e4c5c66b9a17 drivers/md/dm.c
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c Mon Nov 09 13:38:38 2009 -0800
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c Mon Nov 09 14:21:13 2009 -0800
@@ -1998,28 +1998,24 @@
if (MAJOR(dev) != _major || minor >= (1 << MINORBITS))
return NULL;
- spin_lock(&_minor_lock);
-
md = idr_find(&_minor_idr, minor);
if (md && (md == MINOR_ALLOCED ||
(MINOR(disk_devt(dm_disk(md))) != minor) ||
- test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags))) {
- md = NULL;
- goto out;
- }
-
-out:
- spin_unlock(&_minor_lock);
+ test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags)))
+ return NULL;
return md;
}
struct mapped_device *dm_get_md(dev_t dev)
{
- struct mapped_device *md = dm_find_md(dev);
+ struct mapped_device *md;
+ spin_lock(&_minor_lock);
+ md = dm_find_md(dev);
if (md)
dm_get(md);
+ spin_unlock(&_minor_lock);
return md;
}
@@ -2584,11 +2580,17 @@
if (&md->kobj != kobj)
return NULL;
+ spin_lock(&_minor_lock);
+
if (test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags) ||
test_bit(DMF_DELETING, &md->flags))
- return NULL;
+ md = NULL;
- dm_get(md);
+ if (md)
+ dm_get(md);
+
+ spin_unlock(&_minor_lock);
+
return md;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-05 13:21 a deadlock bug in the kernel-side device mapper code guy keren
2009-11-05 14:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-11-06 2:58 ` [PATCH] " Mikulas Patocka
[not found] ` <20091106151504.GS13375@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
2009-11-06 16:30 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-11-06 17:27 ` malahal
2009-11-09 8:51 ` Mike Anderson
2009-11-09 17:57 ` malahal
2009-11-09 22:24 ` malahal [this message]
2009-11-10 0:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-11-10 1:50 ` malahal
2009-11-10 5:24 ` Mike Anderson
2009-11-10 6:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-11-06 0:24 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109222425.GA3577@us.ibm.com \
--to=malahal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox