From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: rq-based mpath failed path on SCSI target failure (malformed discard)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:40:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100726174031.GA11088@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4DB67D.1070903@cs.wisc.edu>
On Mon, Jul 26 2010 at 12:23pm -0400,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 10:00 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >index ec2b43e..125c80f 100644
> >--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> >@@ -1272,6 +1272,9 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
> > if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> > return error;
> >
> >+ if (clone->cmd_flags& REQ_DISCARD)
> >+ return error; /* pass all discard request failures up */
> >+
>
>
> If a discard where failed due to a transport problem then you are
> going to fail the IO instead of just retrying on another path.
>
> You need something like Hannes's work to pass up the sense, or
> something like generic block error codes like I started to work on,
> so you know why the IO failed.
Thanks for reminding me about previous work done in the area of error
propagation.
Yes, we certainly need a more intelligent check but since neither of the
solutions you referenced are available yet we're better off failing the
discard in the near-term. Clearly not ideal but failing a path when an
optional discard IO failure occurs isn't going to fly either.
I'll slap a FIXME on this interim "fix".
In parallel I'll see if I can track down Hannes' and/or your work,
rebase it as needed, etc. If you have updated patches please let me
know.
Thanks,
Mike
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 13:30 rq-based mpath failed path on SCSI target failure (malformed discard) Mike Snitzer
2010-07-26 15:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-26 16:23 ` Mike Christie
2010-07-26 17:40 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100726174031.GA11088@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).