From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: direct-io regression [Was: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs] Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:01:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20100805190138.GV29846@think> References: <20100804085039.GA11671@infradead.org> <20100804091317.GA27779@isilmar-3.linta.de> <20100804092122.GA2998@infradead.org> <20100804073546.GA7494@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <201008041116.09822@zmi.at> <20100804102526.GB13766@isilmar-3.linta.de> <15446.1280953986@localhost> <20100805093100.GA3001@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> <20100805113240.GA29846@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Moyer Cc: Dominik Brodowski , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, josef@redhat.com, Michael Monnerie , Christoph Hellwig , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:58:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Chris Mason writes: > > > But, I'm surprised your drive is doing 8K dio reads at 16MB/s, that > > seems a little high. > > I'm not sure why you think that. We're talking about a plain old SATA > disk, right? I can get 40-50MB/s on my systems for 8KB O_DIRECT reads. > What am I missing? Clearly I'm wrong, his drive is going much faster ;) I expect the smaller reads to be slower but the drive's internal cache is doing well. -chris