From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 15:08:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20101010130842.GE8256@basil.fritz.box> References: <20101010115941.GA8539@basil.fritz.box> <4CB1B3B9.4030205@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CB1B3B9.4030205@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Milan Broz Cc: Andi Kleen , device-mapper development , Andi Kleen , pedrib@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon , Mike Snitzer List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:38:17PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 10/10/2010 01:59 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 > > > > [Due to popular demand this is a port of the dm-crypt scalability > > patch to 2.6.36-rc7. The 2.6.35 and .32 patches were widely used by > > lots of users with good results. > > > > Hi Andi, > > please can you check split patches in > http://mbroz.fedorapeople.org/dm-crypt/2.6.36-devel/ > > is there some change in your new version? Yes I updated the work queue setup and ported it to all these changes in 2.6.36. See the changelog in the description. I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups. > Can I send this to dm-devel instead? > (It is better for review.) What review? The code has been ready since last merge window at least and was revied back then is my understanding. The various versions I posted have been extensively tested by lots of people, including me. -Andi