From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
pedrib@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101010160608.GE26728@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB1DD1A.5080906@redhat.com>
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely
> > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups.
>
> Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate
> things from my point of view.
Is not obvious to me.
>
> Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now.
Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge
(and also I already have an active user base, people are using
it because it's solving a wide spread problem)
I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly
completely open now again and such contortions as you
did to the patch should be needed.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 11:59 [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 12:38 ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2010-10-10 12:53 ` Milan Broz
2010-10-10 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 13:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 15:34 ` Milan Broz
2010-10-10 16:06 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-10-10 16:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-10 16:41 ` Milan Broz
2010-10-10 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-10 18:56 ` [PATCH] Fix double free and use generic private pointer in per-cpu struct Milan Broz
2010-10-14 19:26 ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2010-10-20 14:20 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 Milan Broz
2010-10-20 17:32 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-10-10 17:01 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-10-10 17:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 18:17 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2010-10-10 18:48 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-10-10 18:51 ` [dm-devel] " Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 19:07 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-10-10 19:16 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-10 19:31 ` Milan Broz
2010-10-10 20:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-10-11 9:32 ` Milan Broz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101010160608.GE26728@basil.fritz.box \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=pedrib@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).