From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs v3 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:06:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20101010160608.GE26728@basil.fritz.box> References: <20101010115941.GA8539@basil.fritz.box> <4CB1B3B9.4030205@redhat.com> <20101010130842.GE8256@basil.fritz.box> <4CB1DD1A.5080906@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CB1DD1A.5080906@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Milan Broz Cc: Andi Kleen , Andi Kleen , device-mapper development , pedrib@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon , Mike Snitzer List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 05:34:50PM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/10/2010 03:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I did it intentionally not split up because a split up is unlikely > > to be bisectable. I think there is no need for any splitups. > > Shrug. The main encryption thread and ESSIV per-cpu are two separate > things from my point of view. Is not obvious to me. > > Anyway, the ball is on DM maintainer's playground now. Well I was told already for 2.6.35 it was ready to merge (and also I already have an active user base, people are using it because it's solving a wide spread problem) I am frankly somewhat surprised things should be suddenly completely open now again and such contortions as you did to the patch should be needed. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.