From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm mpath: delay retry activate_path on SCSI_DH_RETRY
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:32:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101102193217.GA23680@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244580864.11385.4.camel@chandra-ubuntu>
On Tue, Jun 09 2009 at 4:54pm -0400,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> Repost with changes made to apply cleanly on top of the patch
> (http://marc.info/?l=dm-devel&m=124424663327710&w=2) that changed
> dm-mpath.c
>
> -----------------
> From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
>
> SCSI Device Handlers return SCSI_DH_IMM_RETRY if we could retry
> immediately and SCSI_DH_RETRY in cases where it is better to retry
> after some delay.
>
> Currently we retry immediately irrespective of SCSI_DH_IMM_RETRY and
> SCSI_DH_RETRY. This patch adds a user configurable attribute
> pg_init_delay_secs which specifies the number of seconds to delay
> before retrying scsi_dh_activate, when it returned SCSI_DH_RETRY.
>
> Default for this attribute is set to 2 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
I'm auditing dm-devel's patchwork and would just like to confirm that
others would still like to see this go in?
Patch in question is captured here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29088/
Mike C.,
An earlier version of this patch got your "Looks ok.":
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/23946/
Can I translate that to your "Acked-by:" if/when I rebase and repost?
Please advise,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 3:18 [PATCH] dm mpath: delay retry activate_path on SCSI_DH_RETRY Chandra Seetharaman
2009-05-15 3:10 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-05-15 13:38 ` Mike Christie
2009-06-09 20:54 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2010-11-02 19:32 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-11-02 19:56 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2010-11-02 21:02 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101102193217.GA23680@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).