From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Promise_Linux <Promise_Linux@promise.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block: Deprecate QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER and use queue_limits instead
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 21:28:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101126022804.GA15662@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1r5e8ncmz.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On Thu, Nov 25 2010 at 7:37pm -0500,
Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> wrote:
> New version below, fixing the things you and Matthew pointed out...
>
>
>
> block: Deprecate QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER and use queue_limits instead
>
> When stacking devices, a request_queue is not always available. This
> forced us to have a no_cluster flag in the queue_limits that could be
> used as a carrier until the request_queue had been set up for a
> metadevice.
>
> There were several problems with that approach. First of all it was up
> to the stacking device to remember to set queue flag after stacking had
> completed.
But that was already done properly, so that wasn't a problem that needed
fixing (it just had potential to be overlooked if/when there is a new
stacking driver).
> Also, the queue flag and the queue limits had to be kept in
> sync at all times. We got that wrong, which could lead to us issuing
> commands that went beyond the max scatterlist limit set by the driver.
It took me a bit to see exactly where we got it wrong. Looks like
__scsi_alloc_queue was only concerned with the queue flag. So a
minimalist fix would've been to also set no_cluster = 1 in
__scsi_alloc_queue?
(OK, I just reviewed Ed's initial report and that is exactly what his
proposed patch did! :)
This patch's header could stand to be a bit more explicit about where
the real problem was ...
But I agree that this patch cleans things up nicely.
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-20 1:24 QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER? Ed Lin - PTU
2010-11-25 15:21 ` [dm-devel] QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER? Martin K. Petersen
2010-11-25 16:35 ` block: Deprecate QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER and use queue_limits instead Martin K. Petersen
2010-11-25 18:43 ` Jens Axboe
2010-11-26 0:37 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-11-26 2:28 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-11-26 2:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-11-26 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2010-12-01 18:43 ` Jens Axboe
2010-11-29 19:08 ` [dm-devel] QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER? Ed Lin - PTU
2010-11-30 18:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-12-07 21:48 ` [stable] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101126022804.GA15662@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Promise_Linux@promise.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).