From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@lsi.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] multipathd: use 0 for initial pg if nr_priority_groups=0 (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:34:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110131183445.GA13689@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E463DF2B2E584B4A82673F53D62C2EF4FF372B9C@cosmail01.lsi.com>
On Mon, Jan 31 2011 at 1:09pm -0500,
Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@lsi.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Snitzer [mailto:snitzer@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 10:14 AM
> > To: dm-devel@redhat.com
> > Cc: Mike Snitzer; Moger, Babu
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups
> >
> > If an mpath device is held open when all paths in the last priority
> > group have failed userspace multipathd will attempt to reload the
> > associated DM table to reflect that the device no longer has any
> > priority groups. But the reload attempt always failed because the
> > multipath target did not allow 0 priority groups.
> >
> > Adjust multipath target to allow a table with both 0 priority groups
> > and 0 for the initial priority group number.
> >
> > All multipath target messages related to priority group (enable_group,
> > disable_group, switch_group) will properly handle a priority group of
> > 0 (will cause error).
> >
> > When reloading a multipath table with 0 priority groups, userspace
> > multipathd must be updated to specify an initial priority group number
> > of 0 (rather than 1).
>
> Looks like we still have some action from multipath tool. CCing Ben..
Right, I looked in to the multipath-tools change. Here is an RFC patch.
Inlined "FIXME"s pose the relevant questions. I held off on having
select_path_group() return 0 when !mpp->pg because I wasn't confident
that I wouldn't break multipathd in some unintuitive way.
I did audit the various callers (indirect through setup_map call):
update_path_groups
ev_add_path
ev_remove_path
(all above first call setup_map)
setup_map()
- mpp->bestpg = select_path_group()
- assemble_map() -- establishes mp->params
do_map()
Even though I verified that much I wasn't completely confident in
changing select_path_group()'s defualt return of 1 -- so I localized the
change to where I _knew_ it was safe (assemble_map):
diff --git a/libmultipath/dmparser.c b/libmultipath/dmparser.c
index 1ef3aad..97b6420 100644
--- a/libmultipath/dmparser.c
+++ b/libmultipath/dmparser.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ assemble_map (struct multipath * mp)
int i, j;
int shift, freechar;
int minio;
+ int nr_priority_groups, initial_pg_nr;
char * p;
struct pathgroup * pgp;
struct path * pp;
@@ -60,9 +61,19 @@ assemble_map (struct multipath * mp)
p = mp->params;
freechar = sizeof(mp->params);
+ nr_priority_groups = VECTOR_SIZE(mp->pg);
+ /*
+ * FIXME: make this conditional on multipath target version?
+ * - but no existing code is conditional on multipath target version,
+ * nor does dm_drvprereq() store the version for code to do so.
+ * - thing is older multipath never allowed nr_priority_groups=0 so
+ * it doesn't _really_ matter if initial_pg_nr=0 here...
+ */
+ initial_pg_nr = (nr_priority_groups ? mp->bestpg : 0);
+
shift = snprintf(p, freechar, "%s %s %i %i",
mp->features, mp->hwhandler,
- VECTOR_SIZE(mp->pg), mp->bestpg);
+ nr_priority_groups, initial_pg_nr);
if (shift >= freechar) {
fprintf(stderr, "mp->params too small\n");
diff --git a/libmultipath/switchgroup.c b/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
index 025a95d..82c30ad 100644
--- a/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
+++ b/libmultipath/switchgroup.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ select_path_group (struct multipath * mpp)
struct pathgroup * pgp;
if (!mpp->pg)
- return 1;
+ return 1; /* FIXME: return 0 here? */
vector_foreach_slot (mpp->pg, pgp, i) {
if (!pgp->paths)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 16:14 [PATCH 1/2] dm mpath: fail message ioctl if specified path is not valid Mike Snitzer
2011-01-31 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups Mike Snitzer
2011-01-31 18:09 ` Moger, Babu
2011-01-31 18:34 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-02-01 15:38 ` [RFC PATCH] multipathd: use 0 for initial pg if nr_priority_groups=0 Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-10 22:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-11 15:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-01 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: allow table load with 0 priority groups Hannes Reinecke
2011-02-10 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-10 21:13 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110131183445.GA13689@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@lsi.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox