From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Thornber Subject: Re: dm-thin vs lvm performance Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:33:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20120120173333.GA12920@ubuntu> References: <1326416116.56981.YahooMailNeo@web36404.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20120116124158.GA4426@ubuntu> <1326915054.99335.YahooMailNeo@web36407.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20120120170335.GA10518@ubuntu> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120120170335.GA10518@ubuntu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jagan Reddy , device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 05:03:35PM +0000, Joe Thornber wrote: > For me, the first run of aio_stress manages a throughput of ~9G/s. > After the wipe, which is just a simple dd across the device, > performance drops to ~5.5 G/s. Also throughput on the device under > the linear target also drops. Permanently. > > I don't know if this is specific to aio, or a more general slowdown. It's just me being stupid. For the initial pass the ramdisk has no memory backing it and is just returning zeroes. Back to testing ... - Joe