From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [PATCH] reworked dm-switch target Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:09:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20120816070955.GA32526@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> References: Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Mikulas Patocka , Kevin_OKelley@dell.com, Jim_Ramsay@dell.com, Narendran_Ganapathy@dell.com, dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 06:36:55PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > For example "dmsetup message switch 0 set-table 0-15:0 16-31:1 32-33:2" What I think we need to know now is how large this makes a typical message to set up the table. Set up can be split between several messages. Or is typical data sufficiently random and large that a more-compact might be a better idea? Alasdair