From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: dm-mpath: do not change SCSI device handler
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:20:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130404142048.GB10208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1304040918460.17024@file.rdu.redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 04 2013 at 9:36am -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 04 2013 at 8:55am -0400,
> > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll take a look at fixing this by deferring the scsi_dh switch until
> > > > resume. This fix would assume multipath-tools is _not_ doing a noflush
> > > > suspend/resume when it is switching the scsi_dh.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > >
> > > This won't work because scsi_dh_attach allocates memory and you can't
> > > allocate memory when something is suspended.
> >
> > Ah yeah, scsi_dh->attach allocates memory for scsi_dh_data. But
> > couldn't those scsi_dh_* attach allocations be switched from GFP_KERNEL
> > to GFP_NOIO?
>
> Yes and no.
>
> GFP_NOIO allocations don't issue any IO, so they have higher possibility
> of failure - if the memory is full of user space pages or dirty file pages
> and there are no clean cache pages, then GFP_NOIO allocation can't make
> any progress and fails. GFP_KERNEL allocation could swap out some pages
> and succeed.
>
> On the other hand, kernel developers use GFP_NOIO allocations and assume
> that they don't fail. And they don't fail most of the time. Although I
> have seen cases where it failed and caused trouble - when allocating
> inodes with GFP_NOIO under high memory stress. (the correct solution would
> be to allocate the inode with GFP_KERNEL earlier, when we are not holding
> any filesystem lock).
>
> >From the point of formal correctness, relying on GFP_NOIO is wrong, but if
> the allocated space is small and it happens infrequently (only on
> activation), you can likely get away with it without being caught.
I'm suggesting that switching the scsi_dh is not something that will be
done on a system that is suffering from serious memory contention.
But I think we need to get back to analyzing the scsi_dh change you
mentioned before with tracking counts, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 0:04 [PATCH] dm-mpath: do not change SCSI device handler Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-03 13:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-03 20:54 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-04 6:47 ` [PATCH] " Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-04 12:24 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-04 12:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-04 13:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-04 13:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-04 14:20 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-04-04 15:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-04 15:38 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] [SCSI] scsi_dh: add scsi_dh_alloc_data Mike Snitzer
2013-04-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] dm mpath: attach scsi_dh during table resume Mike Snitzer
2013-04-22 22:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 13:48 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 14:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 14:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2013-04-25 15:27 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2013-04-25 15:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-25 15:44 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2013-04-25 15:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-26 6:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-26 13:29 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130404142048.GB10208@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox