From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: ejt@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix stacking of geometry limits for thinp and cache
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:29:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130815142912.GA27908@redhat.com> (raw)
Do not blindly override the queue limits (specifically io_min and
io_opt). Allow traditional stacking of these limits if io_opt is a
factor of each target's block size.
Without this patch mkfs.xfs does not recognize these target provided
limits as a useful geometry (e.g. raid) so these hints are ignored.
This was due to setting io_min to a useless value.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 12 ++++++++++--
drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 12 ++++++++++--
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ linux/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -2609,9 +2609,17 @@ static void set_discard_limits(struct ca
static void cache_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
{
struct cache *cache = ti->private;
+ unsigned io_opt_sectors = limits->io_opt >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
- blk_limits_io_min(limits, 0);
- blk_limits_io_opt(limits, cache->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+ /*
+ * If the system-determined stacked limits are compatible with the
+ * cache's blocksize (io_opt is a factor) do not override them.
+ */
+ if (io_opt_sectors < cache->sectors_per_block ||
+ do_div(io_opt_sectors, cache->sectors_per_block)) {
+ blk_limits_io_min(limits, 0);
+ blk_limits_io_opt(limits, cache->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+ }
set_discard_limits(cache, limits);
}
Index: linux/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ linux/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -2648,9 +2648,17 @@ static void pool_io_hints(struct dm_targ
{
struct pool_c *pt = ti->private;
struct pool *pool = pt->pool;
+ unsigned io_opt_sectors = limits->io_opt >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
- blk_limits_io_min(limits, 0);
- blk_limits_io_opt(limits, pool->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+ /*
+ * If the system-determined stacked limits are compatible with the
+ * pool's blocksize (io_opt is a factor) do not override them.
+ */
+ if (io_opt_sectors < pool->sectors_per_block ||
+ do_div(io_opt_sectors, pool->sectors_per_block)) {
+ blk_limits_io_min(limits, 0);
+ blk_limits_io_opt(limits, pool->sectors_per_block << SECTOR_SHIFT);
+ }
/*
* pt->adjusted_pf is a staging area for the actual features to use.
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 14:29 Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-08-15 14:37 ` [PATCH] dm: fix stacking of geometry limits for thinp and cache Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130815142912.GA27908@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).