Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Teng-Feng Yang <shinrairis@gmail.com>
Cc: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, ejt@redhat.com
Subject: Re: thin_dump cannot dump the correct data mapping of thin pools
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:07:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131004140728.GA29551@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTMprPZ01+JaT0YJhYjPd90gdhfcX-Qa1+wUcv85GffXh74aw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 04 2013 at  3:01am -0400,
Teng-Feng Yang <shinrairis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I have been working on an incremental backup tools of thin volumes
> created by dm-thin for a couple of months.
> This tool relies on the data mappings dumped by thin_dump from the
> thin-provisioing-tools.
> As I update thin_dump from version 0.1.5 to 0.2.7, it cannot work
> correctly as the earlier 0.1.5 version.
> 
> The following things have been observed:
> 1. thin_dump-0.2.7 cannot take user-specified "metadata_snap" as
> v0.1.5. It will always return "bad checksum in superblock".
> 2. If "metadata_snap" is not given by users, thin_dump-0.2.7 only
> dumps the out-dated data mappings which can be recognized by observing
> the wrong "transaction id".
> 
> Since it looked like thin_dump failed to get the most up-to-date
> metadata blocks in version 0.2.7, I dig a little deeper into the
> source code and find something that might cause the problem.
> The open flag used on metadata device has been changed from "O_DIRECT
> | O_SYNC" to "0" in commit 4deb1751a650010ce9c15910a064be1348dec8ba .
> After I changed this back to "O_DIRECT | O_SYNC" in version 0.2.7, it
> works as expected once again.
> 
> So here is my question.
> Can I change this flag back to "O_DIRECT | O_SYNC" in any newer version?
> I am worry about that I might accidentally mess something up by
> changing this flag.
> Also, what's the purpose to get rid of the "O_DIRECT" and "O_SYNC"
> flags when we migrate to version 0.2.x?

Getting rid of O_DIRECT provided a fix for this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960284

It is strange that buffered IO breaks thin_dump though.  Joe and/or
Heinz, any ideas?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-04 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-04  7:01 thin_dump cannot dump the correct data mapping of thin pools Teng-Feng Yang
2013-10-04 14:07 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-10-04 14:56 ` Joe Thornber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131004140728.GA29551@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ejt@redhat.com \
    --cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
    --cc=shinrairis@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox