Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	ejt@redhat.com, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm: remove pointless comparison
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:17:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140107181708.GA8715@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CC392F.1070804@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 07 2014 at 12:28pm -0500,
Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01/07/2014 04:52 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07 2014 at  5:39am -0500,
> > Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:53:28PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >>> Remove pointless comparison in dm_get_from_kobject. The comparison is
> >>> always true and the compiler optimizes it out anyway.
> >>>gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/md/dm.c |    2 --
> >>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Index: linux-3.13-rc7/drivers/md/dm.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- linux-3.13-rc7.orig/drivers/md/dm.c	2014-01-07 01:28:27.000000000 +0100
> >>> +++ linux-3.13-rc7/drivers/md/dm.c	2014-01-07 01:28:39.000000000 +0100
> >>> @@ -2922,8 +2922,6 @@ struct mapped_device *dm_get_from_kobjec
> >>>  	struct mapped_device *md;
> >>>  
> >>>  	md = container_of(kobj, struct mapped_device, kobj);
> >>> -	if (&md->kobj != kobj)
> >>> -		return NULL;
> >>
> >> What were they trying to check?  The compiler?
> >>
> > 
> > Milan's commit 784aae735d, and the current dm.c code, offers this
> > comment above dm_get_from_kobject:
> > 
> > /*
> >  * struct mapped_device should not be exported outside of dm.c
> >  * so use this check to verify that kobj is part of md structure
> >  */
> > 
> > I'm lacking the vision to _know_ why the kobject would suddenly be
> > outside of the mapped_device without us knowing via code change..
> > 
> > The check does seem overly cautious/useless (if we remove it the above
> > comment should be removed too).
> 
> Yes, please remove both :) The check doesn't make sense.

Ok, I'll take that as your Acked-by, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07  3:53 [PATCH] dm: remove pointless comparison Mikulas Patocka
2014-01-07 10:39 ` Joe Thornber
2014-01-07 15:52   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-01-07 17:28     ` Milan Broz
2014-01-07 18:17       ` Mike Snitzer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140107181708.GA8715@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ejt@redhat.com \
    --cc=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox