From: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: thomas@glanzmann.de, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: 3PAR transparent failover with Linux
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:11:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140924001144.00007453@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140911125818.GC29930@glanzmann.de>
Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> we have two 3PARs 7400 which are configured for transparent failover. In
> the following manner:
>
> Active Passive
> 3PAR-1 - RCOPY - 3PAR-2
> \ /
> \ /
> Active Standby
> Optimized /
> \ /
> Linux Box
>
> When we run multipath -l before the failover two paths were 'active' the
> other paths 'failed'. Once we failed over and the ALUA state changed,
> all paths went to 'failed':
>
> 360002ac0000000000000000a0000cc14 dm-17 3PARdata,VV
> size=50G features='0' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
> `-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=0 status=enabled
> |- 6:0:6:0 sdak 66:64 failed undef running
> |- 6:0:7:0 sdal 66:80 failed undef running
> |- 7:0:6:0 sdbw 68:160 failed undef running
> `- 7:0:7:0 sdbx 68:176 failed undef running
Do you have a log of the failover?
I think path_grouping_policy set to "multibus" suggests all paths are equal.
Is this actually true for this configuration? I assume paths to 3PAR-1
(active) should have a higher priority than paths to 3PAR-2 (passive).
Since the 3PAR supports ALUA I would change the path_grouping_policy to
"group_by_prio" and prio to "alua".
What is the output of "sg_rtpg -d" for all paths before and after the
failover?
> But we were able to continue I/O. So I wonder why multipath reported 'failed'
> but allowed to continue I/O. So from our standpoint the I/O was continuing. The
> transparent failover successfull. This is not supported by 3PAR for Linux but
> it is for VMware ESX.
Have you tried setting the path_checker to "tur"?
What is the output of "sg_turs -vvv" for all paths?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-11 12:58 3PAR transparent failover with Linux Thomas Glanzmann
2014-09-23 22:11 ` Sebastian Herbszt [this message]
2014-09-24 3:32 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2014-09-24 7:10 ` Thomas Glanzmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140924001144.00007453@localhost \
--to=herbszt@gmx.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox