From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dm: reduce memory overhead of DM devices
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:48:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141003204852.GA14135@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141003132328.GB11977@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 03 2014 at 9:23am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03 2014 at 7:48am -0400,
> Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
> > This series of patches reduce the memory overhead of device-mapper
> > device mainly by removing unused mempool for bio vecs.
> >
> > DM creates per-device bioset to ensure forward progress under
> > low memory situation and bioset always includes mempool for bvec.
> >
> > However, with the introduction of immutable bvec by Kent Overstreet,
> > dm core now uses bio_clone_fast for creating a clone bio, and no longer
> > needs bvecs for it.
> >
> > For example, when you create 10,000 bio-based DM devices and 1,000
> > request-based DM devices, memory usage of biovec under no load is:
> > # grep biovec /proc/slabinfo
> > biovec-256 418068 418068 4096 ...
> > biovec-128 0 0 2048 ...
> > biovec-64 0 0 1024 ...
> > biovec-16 0 0 256 ...
> >
> > With this patch series applied, the usage becomes:
> > # grep biovec /proc/slabinfo
> > biovec-256 116 116 4096 ...
> > biovec-128 0 0 2048 ...
> > biovec-64 0 0 1024 ...
> > biovec-16 0 0 256 ...
> >
> > So 4096 * (418068 - 116) = 1.6GB of memory is saved in this example.
>
> Very nice Junichi!
>
> Kent definitely left us some low hanging fruit that offers a huge win
> (and fixes the really long-standing problem of excessive memory reserves
> for each request-based DM device!)
>
> Jens, this is obviously an awkward patchset given it touches both block
> and DM (block more so than DM). I'd be fine with you pulling it into
> block (or vice-versa if you're OK with me staging it for 3.18 via
> linux-dm.git with your Acked-by).
I picked up this patchset, refactored the patches based on my earlier
suggested s/bioset_nobvec_create/bioset_create_nobvec/ rename and
tweaked headers a bit. I've staged the result in the for-next branch of
linux-dm.git for v3.18 inclusion, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=for-next
b83bb63 dm: remove nr_iovecs parameter from alloc_tio()
b875215 block: use bio_clone_fast() in blk_rq_prep_clone()
cd595c9 block: add bioset_create_nobvec()
3611594 dm: use bioset_create_nobvec()
Jens, I can easily yield this patchset to you if you care. Or I can
backfill your Acked-by in the above 2 block commits (I obviously won't
just send block changes upstream without your OK!).
Please advise, thanks!
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-03 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-03 11:48 [PATCH 0/4] dm: reduce memory overhead of DM devices Junichi Nomura
2014-10-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] dm: remove nr_iovecs parameter from alloc_tio() Junichi Nomura
2014-10-03 20:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: use bio_clone_fast() in blk_rq_prep_clone() Junichi Nomura
2014-10-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: add bioset_nobvec_create() Junichi Nomura
2014-10-03 13:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] dm: use bioset_nobvec_create() Junichi Nomura
2014-10-03 13:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] dm: reduce memory overhead of DM devices Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 20:48 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2014-10-03 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
2014-10-03 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 21:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dm: remove nr_iovecs parameter from alloc_tio() Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 21:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] block: use bio_clone_fast() in blk_rq_prep_clone() Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 21:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] block: add bioset_create_nobvec() Mike Snitzer
2014-10-03 21:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dm: use bioset_create_nobvec() Mike Snitzer
2014-10-05 23:06 ` Junichi Nomura
2014-10-06 0:24 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-10-04 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] dm: reduce memory overhead of DM devices Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141003204852.GA14135@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox