From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: [PATCH] block: fix blk_stack_limits() regression due to lcm() change
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:39:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150330173909.GA4836@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMM=eLdw+7zfoufBEBSKhVR5d=g-a-GdzTA4WBgXUcMx=Av91A@mail.gmail.com>
Linux 3.19 commit 69c953c ("lib/lcm.c: lcm(n,0)=lcm(0,n) is 0, not n")
caused blk_stack_limits() to not properly stack queue_limits for stacked
devices (e.g. DM).
Fix this regression by establishing lcm_not_zero() and switching
blk_stack_limits() over to using it.
DM uses blk_set_stacking_limits() to establish the initial top-level
queue_limits that are then built up based on underlying devices' limits
using blk_stack_limits(). In the case of optimal_io_size (io_opt)
blk_set_stacking_limits() establishes a default value of 0. With commit
69c953c, lcm(0, n) is no longer n, which compromises proper stacking of
the underlying devices' io_opt.
Test:
$ modprobe scsi_debug dev_size_mb=10 num_tgts=1 opt_blks=1536
$ cat /sys/block/sde/queue/optimal_io_size
786432
$ dmsetup create node --table "0 100 linear /dev/sde 0"
Before this fix:
$ cat /sys/block/dm-5/queue/optimal_io_size
0
After this fix:
$ cat /sys/block/dm-5/queue/optimal_io_size
786432
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+
---
block/blk-settings.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/lcm.h | 1 +
lib/lcm.c | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 6ed2cbe..12600bf 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
b->physical_block_size);
t->io_min = max(t->io_min, b->io_min);
- t->io_opt = lcm(t->io_opt, b->io_opt);
+ t->io_opt = lcm_not_zero(t->io_opt, b->io_opt);
t->cluster &= b->cluster;
t->discard_zeroes_data &= b->discard_zeroes_data;
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
b->raid_partial_stripes_expensive);
/* Find lowest common alignment_offset */
- t->alignment_offset = lcm(t->alignment_offset, alignment)
+ t->alignment_offset = lcm_not_zero(t->alignment_offset, alignment)
% max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min);
/* Verify that new alignment_offset is on a logical block boundary */
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
b->max_discard_sectors);
t->discard_granularity = max(t->discard_granularity,
b->discard_granularity);
- t->discard_alignment = lcm(t->discard_alignment, alignment) %
+ t->discard_alignment = lcm_not_zero(t->discard_alignment, alignment) %
t->discard_granularity;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/lcm.h b/include/linux/lcm.h
index 7bf01d7..1ce79a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/lcm.h
+++ b/include/linux/lcm.h
@@ -4,5 +4,6 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h>
unsigned long lcm(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) __attribute_const__;
+unsigned long lcm_not_zero(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) __attribute_const__;
#endif /* _LCM_H */
diff --git a/lib/lcm.c b/lib/lcm.c
index e97dbd5..03d7fcb 100644
--- a/lib/lcm.c
+++ b/lib/lcm.c
@@ -12,3 +12,14 @@ unsigned long lcm(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lcm);
+
+unsigned long lcm_not_zero(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
+{
+ unsigned long l = lcm(a, b);
+
+ if (l)
+ return l;
+
+ return (b ? : a);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lcm_not_zero);
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1418158984-25546-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
[not found] ` <1418158984-25546-2-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
2015-03-29 2:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/lcm.c: lcm(n,0)=lcm(0,n) is 0, not n Mike Snitzer
2015-03-30 17:39 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2015-03-30 20:53 ` [PATCH] block: fix blk_stack_limits() regression due to lcm() change Martin K. Petersen
2015-03-30 19:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/lcm.c: lcm(n,0)=lcm(0,n) is 0, not n Rasmus Villemoes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150330173909.GA4836@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox