From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: Inline blk_integrity in struct gendisk Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:36:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20151009073615.GA9144@infradead.org> References: <20150721120102.GB1654@infradead.org> <1440103314-31610-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <1440103314-31610-6-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com> <20150916010720.GA21398@redhat.com> <20150921204506.GA36289@redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150921204506.GA36289@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , dm-devel@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox , Keith Busch , Dan Williams List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 04:45:07PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > Here is what I came up with. Leaves something to be desired given the > integrity profile is being established on first table load (as opposed > to during resume like the old DM and block integrity code did).. but we > can iterate on this as needed. > > Feel free to fold it into your last patch and add my Signed-off-by. Martin, any chance to repost with Mike's changes folded in? I'd really hate to miss 4.4 for the series.