From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: dm-multipath low performance with blk-mq Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:56:52 -0800 Message-ID: <20160126145652.GA25437@infradead.org> References: <569E11EA.8000305@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20160119224512.GA10515@redhat.com> <20160125214016.GA10060@redhat.com> <20160125233717.GQ24960@octiron.msp.redhat.com> <20160126132939.GA23967@redhat.com> <56A77C21.90605@suse.de> <20160126144713.GA24239@redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160126144713.GA24239@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "keith.busch@intel.com" , dm-devel@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:47:13AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > [you're killing me.. you nuked all CCs again] I think that's the reply-to defaults for dm-devel. They try to do that to me all that time, but fortunately I configure mutt to not blindly follow that bad advice but ask me instead.