From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] dm path selector: Avoid that device removal triggers an infinite loop
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:26:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901152641.GA65959@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bda2e9d3-69b9-671b-296b-3be7b5bc79cf@sandisk.com>
On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 11:22P -0400,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 08:06 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 01 2016 at 10:14am -0400,
> >Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On 08/31/16 20:29, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Aug 31 2016 at 6:18pm -0400,
> >>>Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>If pg_init_retries is set and a request is queued against a
> >>>>multipath device with all underlying block devices in the "dying"
> >>>>state then an infinite loop is triggered because activate_path()
> >>>>never succeeds and hence never calls pg_init_done(). Fix this by
> >>>>making ql_select_path() skip dying paths.
> >>>
> >>>Assuming DM multipath needs to be sprinkling these dying queue checks so
> >>>deep (which I'm not yet sold on):
> >>>
> >>>Same would be needed in service-time and round-robin right?
> >>
> >>Hello Mike,
> >>
> >>Before addressing service-time and round-robin path selectors I wanted
> >>to make sure that we reach agreement about how to fix the queue length
> >>path selector.
> >>
> >>Do you have a proposal for an alternative approach to fix the infinite
> >>loop that can be triggered during device removal?
> >
> >I'm going to look closer now. But I'd prefer to see the "dying" state
> >check(s) elevated to DM multipath. Really would rather the path
> >selectors not have to worry about this state.
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> How about making blk_cleanup_queue() invoke a callback function in dm or
> dm-mpath and to use that callback function to keep track of the number of
> paths that are not in the "dying" state? That would allow to detect in the
> dm or dm-mpath driver whether or not all paths are in the dying state
> without having to modify every path selector. This is just an idea - there
> might be better alternatives.
Even that seems like overkill. What about this? Any chance you could
try the linux-dm.git 'dm-4.9' branch with this patch ontop?
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index ac734e5..15db5e9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -1521,10 +1521,10 @@ static void activate_path(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pgpath *pgpath =
container_of(work, struct pgpath, activate_path.work);
+ struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev);
- if (pgpath->is_active)
- scsi_dh_activate(bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev),
- pg_init_done, pgpath);
+ if (pgpath->is_active && !blk_queue_dying(q))
+ scsi_dh_activate(q, pg_init_done, pgpath);
else
pg_init_done(pgpath, SCSI_DH_DEV_OFFLINED);
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 22:14 [PATCH 0/9] dm patches for kernel v4.9 Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_queue_stopped() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/9] dm: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 3:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/9] dm: Introduce signal_pending_state() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/9] dm: Convert wait loops Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] dm: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: Simplify dm_old_stop_queue() Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Mark block layer queue dead before destroying the dm device Bart Van Assche
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 3:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 16:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 17:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 19:05 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 19:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 20:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 20:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 21:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 22:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 22:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 23:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 23:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 0:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-02 15:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 16:10 ` should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? [was: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dm: Fix two race conditions related to stopping and starting queues] Mike Snitzer
2016-09-02 22:42 ` [dm-devel] should blk-mq halt requeue processing while queue is frozen? Bart Van Assche
2016-09-03 0:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-07 16:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-13 8:01 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2016-09-13 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-08-31 22:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm path selector: Avoid that device removal triggers an infinite loop Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 2:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 14:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-01 15:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-09-01 15:26 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160901152641.GA65959@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).