dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Yibin Wang <wangyibin@huawei.com>
Cc: Jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm-mpath: Handling SCSI-3 PR RELEASE in multi-controller	environment
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:51:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161014145119.GA22787@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57FF5194.4030402@huawei.com>

Hi Yibin,

>>> 	- For reserve/query/preempt/clear, we should return success once an
>>> 	 iteration returns successfully.
>> That's what the dm_grab_bdev_for_ioctl path does.
>
> If I understand correctly, dm_grab_bdev_for_ioctl() select a working path, 
> and
> pr_*() uses that path to do the actually work.
>
> This works for reserve/query/preempt/clear, but it may not work for 
> release.

You're right - if we had a path mapping change inbetween we might
have a problem with the unregister.  That beeing said we have an even
worse problem if the path we registered on disappeared permanently,
so we'll probably need a slightly more complex loop than the one
we have right now.

> I meant the API that callers from above block layer can use - They can not 
> call
> dm_pr_*() directly. So adding blkdev_pr_ops_{register/reserve/etc}() would 
> be
> great.

Take a look at the pNFS SCSI layout driver under fs/nfs/blocklayout
which is the currently existing in-kernel user of the API, it just
calls the block device methods directly.

What additional work would you place in the ops?  Also can you please
send me a link to your user of the API?

>
>>> 5. Support for multiple targets devices.
>>> An md device might have multiple targets. Current implementation only supports
>>> single target device.
>> That's because it is so far only intended for dm-multipath, which always
>> uses as single target.  I'm not against multi-target support, but we'll
>> need a detailed explanation of the use case.
>
> OK. Fair enough. That's rather a "good-to-have" than a "must-have".

As said I'm fine with adding as an enhancement, especially if you submit
an in-kernel user for it, but a useful opensource application also
would be more than enough of a justification

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-14 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-09 13:12 dm-mpath: Handling SCSI-3 PR RELEASE in multi-controller environment wangyibin
2016-10-09 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13  9:19   ` Yibin Wang
2016-10-13 11:16     ` Yibin Wang
2016-10-14 13:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-14 14:51     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-21  9:14 jiangyiwen
2016-09-21 15:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-09-21 17:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-22  8:14   ` jiangyiwen
2016-09-26 16:03     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161014145119.GA22787@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiangyiwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyibin@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).