dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benjamin Marzinski" <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, tang.junhui@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: Improve processing efficiency for addition and deletion of multipath devices
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 12:19:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161121181903.GA1972@octiron.msp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479457857.25031.8.camel@suse.com>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:30:57AM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 16:24 +0800, tang.junhui@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > Hi Martin, 
> > 
> > In your case, my action is: 
> > 1) merger uevents 1) 2) to one uevent "add sda sdb", and process them
> > togother 
> 
> This will fail because sdb is non-existent at the time you try - no?

Yes. If we get a cluster of events for a device, and the last event is a
remove event, we don't need to precess them. Just like you mention,
after that remove event is sent by udev, the device is gone.  There is
nothing that multipathd could do with it even if it wanted to. So there
is no point in trying the add and change event processing, since we
already know that they will fail.

-Ben

> 
> > Though the processing efficiency in such scenario is lower than
> > yours, but it is simple and reliable,
> > more importantly, Martin, you still focus on such special scene,
> > which I concerned is like this: 
> 
> [...]
> 
> I understand what you're concerned with. I just think we need to do
> both. I agree that many events for many different devices are more
> likely. But once you start merging, you'd rather be prepared for
> several events for the same phys device, too.
> 
> Martin
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-21 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16  1:46 Improve processing efficiency for addition and deletion of multipath devices tang.junhui
2016-11-16  7:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-16  8:45   ` tang.junhui
2016-11-16  9:49     ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-17  1:41       ` tang.junhui
2016-11-17 10:48         ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-18  1:02           ` tang.junhui
2016-11-18  7:39             ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-18  8:24               ` tang.junhui
2016-11-18  8:30                 ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-18  8:56                   ` tang.junhui
2016-11-18  9:12                   ` tang.junhui
2016-11-21 18:19                   ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2016-11-18 22:26           ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-23  1:08             ` tang.junhui
2016-11-29  9:07               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-29 10:13                 ` tang.junhui
2016-11-24  9:21             ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-28 18:46               ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-29  6:47                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-29  8:02                   ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-29  8:10                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-29  8:16                       ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-29  8:24                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-29 17:25                     ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-29  7:57                 ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-29 17:41                   ` Benjamin Marzinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-28  2:19 tang.junhui
2016-11-28 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-28 16:07   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-28 16:26     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-28 10:06 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-28 10:42   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-28 11:51     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-28 12:06       ` Peter Rajnoha
2016-11-28 12:08       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-28 12:23         ` Peter Rajnoha
2016-11-28 12:55         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-28 17:22         ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-29  9:34           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-11-28 10:28 ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-28 17:31   ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-29  7:52     ` Martin Wilck
2016-11-29 19:21       ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-28 15:25 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2016-11-28 15:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-12-01  1:16     ` tang.junhui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161121181903.GA1972@octiron.msp.redhat.com \
    --to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mwilck@suse.com \
    --cc=tang.junhui@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).