From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dm-mpath: Fix a race condition in __multipath_map()
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:34:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122003444.GB25362@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4a3879e-ec60-69f6-abb8-95aa7f305277@sandisk.com>
On Mon, Nov 21 2016 at 6:57pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 03:43 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >Shouldn't be possible. The previous stacktrace you shared clearly
> >showed that the DM mpath request_queue was using blk-mq (dm_mq_queue_rq
> >was in the stack).
> >
> >Whereas the stacktrace above is clearly the old request_fn interface.
> >
> >I'm unaware of how the existing code can allow this. As I said in my
> >earlier mails on this: the request-queue shouldn't be able to change
> >from blk-mq back to .request_fn or vice-versa.
> >
> >So if you think you're only testing blk-mq DM mpath on blk-mq paths,
> >then you need to determine how dm_old_init_request_queue() is getting
> >called to even setup .request_fn (dm_old_request_fn) to be used.
> >
> >If the opposite is true (old request_fn DM mpath stack on blk-mq paths)
> >then determine how dm_mq_init_request_queue is getting called.
> >
> >Basically dm_setup_md_queue() should only ever be called the first time
> >the "multipath" target is loaded. If that isn't the case, then you've
> >exposed some seriously weird bug/regression.
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Sorry that I had not yet mentioned this, but the test I'm running is
> as follows:
>
> # while true; do for t in mq sq sq-on-mq; do echo ==== $t;
> srp-test/run_tests -s -t 02-$t; done
But you WARN_ON_ONCE(clone && q->mq_ops) will trigger with sq-on-mq.
So this would seem to be a false positive.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 23:31 [PATCH 0/7] dm-mpath: Fix a race condition in the blk-mq path Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15 23:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm: Fix a (theoretical?) race condition in rq_completed() Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 0:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-15 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm: Simplify dm_table_determine_type() Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 14:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 20:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 21:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 21:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 23:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-15 23:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm-mpath: Document a locking assumption Bart Van Assche
2016-11-18 0:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm-mpath: Change return type of pg_init_all_paths() from int into void Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm-mpath: Do not touch *__clone if request allocation fails Bart Van Assche
2016-11-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm-mpath: Avoid code duplication in __multipath_map() Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 0:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-15 23:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] dm-mpath: Fix a race condition " Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 0:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 0:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 1:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 1:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 1:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-21 21:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-21 23:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-21 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-22 0:34 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-11-22 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-23 0:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-23 3:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-23 18:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-23 18:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 0:47 ` [PATCH 0/7] dm-mpath: Fix a race condition in the blk-mq path Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 0:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 1:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 1:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 1:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 7:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-11-16 14:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-11-16 18:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-16 19:32 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122003444.GB25362@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).