From: "Benjamin Marzinski" <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libmultipath: update 3PARdata builtin config
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:37:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728223713.GI2940@octiron.msp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1f2c3d3-77d1-bb86-c212-b65719815065@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 08:25:30PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 06/29/2017 04:57 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>
> >>> + .fast_io_fail = 10,
> >>> + .dev_loss = MAX_DEV_LOSS_TMO,
>
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> >
> >> It would be nice to have more information.
> >> Why and when is this needed?
> >
> > I assume the change to dev_loss_tmo is simply a preference issue. Like
> > Netapp, they don't want their devices to get auto-removed when they go
> > down. I also assume that in their internal testing, they hit cases where
> > 5 seconds wasn't enough time to wait for some transient issue with the
> > array to resolve. At any rate, I'm simply passing along their request,
> > which seems like a perfectly reasonable one to me.
>
> Those arguments should come from the vendor.
>
> "dev_loss_tmo 14" is recommended(???) in latest 3PAR docs (Jun 2017):
>
> - HPE 3PAR SUSE Linux Enterprise Implementation Guide (Wed 14 Jun 2017 11:48:14 PM CEST)
> http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=c02663748
>
> - HPE 3PAR Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Oracle Linux Implementation Guide (Wed 14 Jun 2017 12:10:06 AM CEST)
> http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay/?docId=c04448818
Here I what I got from HP:
********
We will be changing the recommendation in the next version of the 3PAR
Implementation Guide. I am the owner for these guides.
The reason we want the dev_loss_tmo "infinity" is to help in a feature
called Peer Persistence where on primary array power fails and the
device on the remote array (standby array) becomes active. The standby
state of the device paths will automatically change to active state if
the underlying device instances exist so we need infinity setting.
The fast_io_fail_tmo we want to be bumped from 5 to 10 so that it allows
a array feature called persistent port to work well where we want the
want the array path going away failure transient state to be held for
the longer time in the SCSI and FC OS layers (I/O retry) without
multipath reacting to it which allows the array to move the physical
port flogi instance on the switch to move to partner physical port as an
NPIV Port when the array node goes down. Complete details in this PDF
https://www.hpe.com/h20195/v2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-4545ENW.pdf
*******
-Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-26 19:03 [PATCH] libmultipath: update 3PARdata builtin config Benjamin Marzinski
2017-06-28 17:48 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2017-06-29 14:57 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2017-07-13 18:25 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2017-07-28 22:37 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2017-07-31 11:37 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2017-08-05 6:36 ` Christophe Varoqui
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-05 11:23 Xose Vazquez Perez
2017-08-05 11:54 ` Christophe Varoqui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728223713.GI2940@octiron.msp.redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox