dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:26:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119002616.GC4712@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516295632.2676.16.camel@wdc.com>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:13:53PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 11:50 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > The issue you say it was originally intended to fix _should_ be
> > addressed with this change:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.16&id=4dd6edd23e7ea971efddc303f9e67eb79e95808e
> 
> Hello Mike,
> 
> Sorry but I'm not convinced that that patch is sufficient. That patch helps
> if .end_io() is called with status BLK_STS_RESOURCE and also if
> blk_insert_cloned_request() returns the .queue_rq() return value. It does not
> help if .queue_rq() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE and that return value gets
> ignored.

The return value from .queue_rq() is handled by blk-mq, why do you think
it can be ignored? Please see blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list().

> I think that can happen as follows:
> - Request cloning in multipath_clone_and_map() succeeds and that function
>   returns DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED.
> - dm_dispatch_clone_request() calls blk_insert_cloned_request().
> - blk_insert_cloned_request() calls blk_mq_request_direct_issue(), which
>   results in a call of __blk_mq_try_issue_directly().
> - __blk_mq_try_issue_directly() calls blk_mq_sched_insert_request(). In this

This only happens iff queue is stopped or quiesced, then we return
BLK_STS_OK to blk-mq via .queue_rq(), please see __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(),
how does this cause IO hang? 

>   case the BLK_STS_RESOURCE returned by the .queue_rq() implementation of the
>   underlying path will be ignored.

No, this case won't return BLK_STS_RESOURCE.

-- 
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 16:37 [PATCH] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 16:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 17:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:26     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-01-19  0:33       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:11 ` [PATCH] " Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:18     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:21       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:24       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19  0:35         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:49           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19  6:36             ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119002616.GC4712@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).