Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Javier González" <javier@cnexlabs.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: fold direct_make_requst into generic_make_request
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:58:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227005852.GA15971@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180227001328.GA15748@redhat.com>

On Mon, Feb 26 2018 at  7:13pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 26 2018 at  5:56pm -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The block layer provides a function direct_make_request - but it doesn't
> > provide any test whether this function may be used or not.
> > 
> > Device mapper currently uses a dirty trick - it compares the result of
> > bdevname against the string "nvme" to test if direct_make_request can be
> > used.
> 
> dm's DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED is backed by that crude "nvme" check _but_
> it is a means to an end.  Alternative would be to have NVMe (and other
> devices) set something like QUEUE_FLAG_NO_PARTIAL_COMPLETION or
> something -- and then DM would need to verify all underlying devices set
> that flag.
> 
> > The information whether the driver will or won't recurse can be easily
> > obtained in generic_make_request (by comparing make_request_fn - or
> > alternatively, we could introduce a queue flag for this), so my suggestion
> > is to just delete direct_make_request and fold this "norecurse"
> > optimization directly into generic_make_request This will allow us to
> > simplify device mapper paths and get rid of device name matching.
> 
> Sorry, Nack from me as implemented.  Please see below.

As we discussed, but for the benefit of others: I was mistaken.. I
reviewed your proposal too quickly.

> > Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-core.c	2018-02-26 20:37:19.088499000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c	2018-02-26 20:43:57.839999000 +0100
> > @@ -2265,6 +2265,8 @@ end_io:
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> >  
> > +blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * generic_make_request - hand a buffer to its device driver for I/O
> >   * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> > @@ -2300,10 +2302,14 @@ blk_qc_t generic_make_request(struct bio
> >  	 */
> >  	struct bio_list bio_list_on_stack[2];
> >  	blk_qc_t ret = BLK_QC_T_NONE;
> > +	bool may_recurse;
> >  
> >  	if (!generic_make_request_checks(bio))
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > +	may_recurse = bio->bi_disk->queue->make_request_fn != blk_queue_bio &&
> > +		      bio->bi_disk->queue->make_request_fn != blk_mq_make_request;
> > +
> 
> This does _not_ allow dm's DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED to make use of your
> direct_make_request() equivalent that you've encoded into
> generic_make_request().
> 
> There is no easy way to _know_, at runtime, that an arbitrary queue
> (e.g. stacked DM device) does _not_ split IO (therefore not needing to
> recurse).
> 
> Same can be said of NVMe given NVMe multipath sets its make_request_fn
> to nvme_ns_head_make_request().
> 
> So for both cases that don't need to recurse you're setting @may_recurse
> to true.

Both DM multipath and NVMe native multipath will change the bio->bi_disk
to the underlying NVMe device (which has make_request_fn set to
blk_mq_make_request).  SO: @may_recurse is set to false for both cases.

Sorry for tainting your work, I retract my Nack.  Avoiding the need for
drivers to reason about whether it best to call direct_make_request() vs
generic_make_request() is a welcome advance.  I think you plan on
submitting a v2 that avoids the make_request_fn check.  I'll review that
much more carefully before commenting ;)

Thanks,
Mike

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-27  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-26 22:56 [PATCH] fold direct_make_requst into generic_make_request Mikulas Patocka
2018-02-27  0:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-02-27  0:58   ` Mike Snitzer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180227005852.GA15971@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=javier@cnexlabs.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox