From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Wilck Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] libmultipath: don't reject maps with undefined prio Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 10:34:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20180321093419.9295-1-mwilck@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Christophe Varoqui Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Martin Wilck List-Id: dm-devel.ids libmultipath's prio routines can deal with pp->priority == PRIO_UNDEF just fine. PRIO_UNDEF is just a very low priority. So there's no reason to reject setting up a multipath map because paths have undefined priority. Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck --- libmultipath/configure.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/libmultipath/configure.c b/libmultipath/configure.c index fa6e21cb31af..bb3d8771592d 100644 --- a/libmultipath/configure.c +++ b/libmultipath/configure.c @@ -993,9 +993,6 @@ int coalesce_paths (struct vectors * vecs, vector newmp, char * refwwid, continue; } - if (pp1->priority == PRIO_UNDEF) - mpp->action = ACT_REJECT; - if (!mpp->paths) { condlog(0, "%s: skip coalesce (no paths)", mpp->alias); remove_map(mpp, vecs, 0); @@ -1021,8 +1018,6 @@ int coalesce_paths (struct vectors * vecs, vector newmp, char * refwwid, mpp->size); mpp->action = ACT_REJECT; } - if (pp2->priority == PRIO_UNDEF) - mpp->action = ACT_REJECT; } verify_paths(mpp, vecs); -- 2.16.1