From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: lijie <lijie34@huawei.com>,
xose.vazquez@gmail.com, chengjike.cheng@huawei.com,
shenhong09@huawei.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
wangzhoumengjian@huawei.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
sschremm@netapp.com
Subject: Re: multipath-tools: add ANA support for NVMe device
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:18:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113161838.GC9827@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112215323.GA7983@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:53:23PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12 2018 at 11:23am -0500,
> Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Lijie,
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 14:09 +0800, lijie wrote:
> > > Add support for Asynchronous Namespace Access as specified in NVMe
> > > 1.3
> > > TP 4004. The states are updated through reading the ANA log page.
> > >
> > > By default, the native nvme multipath takes over the nvme device.
> > > We can pass a false to the parameter 'multipath' of the nvme-core.ko
> > > module,when we want to use multipath-tools.
> >
> > Thank you for the patch. It looks quite good to me. I've tested it with
> > a Linux target and found no problems so far.
> >
> > I have a few questions and comments inline below.
> >
> > I suggest you also have a look at detect_prio(); it seems to make sense
> > to use the ana prioritizer for NVMe paths automatically if ANA is
> > supported (with your patch, "detect_prio no" and "prio ana" have to be
> > configured explicitly). But that can be done in a later patch.
>
> I (and others) think it makes sense to at least triple check with the
> NVMe developers (now cc'd) to see if we could get agreement on the nvme
> driver providing the ANA state via sysfs (when modparam
> nvme_core.multipath=N is set), like Hannes proposed here:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-November/020765.html
>
> Then the userspace multipath-tools ANA support could just read sysfs
> rather than reinvent harvesting the ANA state via ioctl.
I'd prefer not duplicating the log page parsing. Maybe nvme's shouldn't
even be tied to CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH so that the 'multipath' param
isn't even an issue.
> But if we continue to hit a wall on that type of sharing of the nvme
> driver's state then I'm fine with reinventing ANA state inquiry and
> tracking like has been proposed here.
>
> Mike
>
> p.s. thanks for your review Martin, we really need to determine the way
> forward for full multipath-tools support of NVMe with ANA.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 6:09 [PATCH] multipath-tools: add ANA support for NVMe device lijie
2018-11-12 16:23 ` Martin Wilck
2018-11-12 21:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-13 6:59 ` Martin Wilck
2018-11-13 16:18 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-13 18:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14 5:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14 7:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 10:36 ` [dm-devel] " Martin Wilck
2018-11-14 17:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14 18:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 19:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-15 17:46 ` [PATCH] nvme: allow ANA support to be independent of native multipathing Mike Snitzer
2018-11-16 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-16 14:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-16 9:14 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 9:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-16 9:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 10:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-16 10:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 19:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-16 19:34 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-11-19 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 14:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-20 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-20 13:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-20 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 14:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-16 18:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14 7:24 ` multipath-tools: add ANA support for NVMe device Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-14 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:16 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113161838.GC9827@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=chengjike.cheng@huawei.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lijie34@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=shenhong09@huawei.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=sschremm@netapp.com \
--cc=wangzhoumengjian@huawei.com \
--cc=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).