Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: return just one value from part_in_flight
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:30:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130003018.GB10015@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181128004251.504425345@debian.vm>

On Tue, Nov 27 2018 at  7:42pm -0500,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:

> The previous patches deleted all the code that needed the second value
> returned from part_in_flight - now the kernel only uses the first value.
> 
> Consequently, part_in_flight (and blk_mq_in_flight) may be changed so that
> it only returns one value.
> 
> This patch just refactors the code, there's no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c            |    6 ++++--
>  block/blk-mq.h            |    3 +--
>  block/genhd.c             |   32 +++++++++++---------------------
>  block/partition-generic.c |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/genhd.h     |    3 +--
>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-block/block/blk-mq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-block.orig/block/blk-mq.c	2018-11-28 00:39:16.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-block/block/blk-mq.c	2018-11-28 00:39:16.000000000 +0100
> @@ -113,13 +113,15 @@ static bool blk_mq_check_inflight(struct
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -void blk_mq_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part,
> -		      unsigned int inflight[2])
> +unsigned int blk_mq_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part)
>  {
> +	unsigned inflight[2];
>  	struct mq_inflight mi = { .part = part, .inflight = inflight, };
>  
>  	inflight[0] = inflight[1] = 0;
>  	blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(q, blk_mq_check_inflight, &mi);
> +
> +	return inflight[0];
>  }


I don't think this change goes deep enough.  You're leaving unnecessary
work (relative to mi->inflight[1]) in blk_mq_check_inflight().

Mike

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-28  0:42 [PATCH 3/3] block: return just one value from part_in_flight Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-30  0:30 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181130003018.GB10015@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox