From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dm dust: report some message results back to user directly
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:08:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200628150804.GA8779@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab1e38c7-0394-a685-a406-2ead0291f4d5@huawei.com>
It is on the dm-devel patchwork list to pick up for the 5.9 merge
window. I've just been busy with other work.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sat, Jun 27 2020 at 9:08pm -0400,
yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike, does there any advice for this patchset?
>
> Thanks,
> Kun.
>
> 在 2020/6/20 5:10, Bryan Gurney 写道:
> >From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> >
> >From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> >
> >Some type of message(queryblock/countbadblocks/removebadblock) may better
> >report results to user directly. Do it with DMEMIT.
> >
> >[Bryan: maintain __func__ output in DMEMIT messages]
> >
> >Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>
> >---
> > drivers/md/dm-dust.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-dust.c b/drivers/md/dm-dust.c
> >index ff03b90072c5..f1f2dd6a4e84 100644
> >--- a/drivers/md/dm-dust.c
> >+++ b/drivers/md/dm-dust.c
> >@@ -138,20 +138,22 @@ static int dust_add_block(struct dust_device *dd, unsigned long long block,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >-static int dust_query_block(struct dust_device *dd, unsigned long long block)
> >+static int dust_query_block(struct dust_device *dd, unsigned long long block, char *result,
> >+ unsigned int maxlen, unsigned int *sz_ptr)
> > {
> > struct badblock *bblock;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >+ unsigned int sz = *sz_ptr;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> > bblock = dust_rb_search(&dd->badblocklist, block);
> > if (bblock != NULL)
> >- DMINFO("%s: block %llu found in badblocklist", __func__, block);
> >+ DMEMIT("%s: block %llu found in badblocklist", __func__, block);
> > else
> >- DMINFO("%s: block %llu not found in badblocklist", __func__, block);
> >+ DMEMIT("%s: block %llu not found in badblocklist", __func__, block);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> >- return 0;
> >+ return 1;
> > }
> > static int __dust_map_read(struct dust_device *dd, sector_t thisblock)
> >@@ -259,11 +261,13 @@ static bool __dust_clear_badblocks(struct rb_root *tree,
> > return true;
> > }
> >-static int dust_clear_badblocks(struct dust_device *dd)
> >+static int dust_clear_badblocks(struct dust_device *dd, char *result, unsigned int maxlen,
> >+ unsigned int *sz_ptr)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> > struct rb_root badblocklist;
> > unsigned long long badblock_count;
> >+ unsigned int sz = *sz_ptr;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> > badblocklist = dd->badblocklist;
> >@@ -273,11 +277,11 @@ static int dust_clear_badblocks(struct dust_device *dd)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> > if (!__dust_clear_badblocks(&badblocklist, badblock_count))
> >- DMINFO("%s: no badblocks found", __func__);
> >+ DMEMIT("%s: no badblocks found", __func__);
> > else
> >- DMINFO("%s: badblocks cleared", __func__);
> >+ DMEMIT("%s: badblocks cleared", __func__);
> >- return 0;
> >+ return 1;
> > }
> > /*
> >@@ -383,7 +387,7 @@ static void dust_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
> > }
> > static int dust_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
> >- char *result_buf, unsigned int maxlen)
> >+ char *result, unsigned int maxlen)
> > {
> > struct dust_device *dd = ti->private;
> > sector_t size = i_size_read(dd->dev->bdev->bd_inode) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> >@@ -393,6 +397,7 @@ static int dust_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
> > unsigned char wr_fail_cnt;
> > unsigned int tmp_ui;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >+ unsigned int sz = 0;
> > char dummy;
> > if (argc == 1) {
> >@@ -410,12 +415,12 @@ static int dust_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
> > r = 0;
> > } else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "countbadblocks")) {
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> >- DMINFO("countbadblocks: %llu badblock(s) found",
> >+ DMEMIT("countbadblocks: %llu badblock(s) found",
> > dd->badblock_count);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->dust_lock, flags);
> >- r = 0;
> >+ r = 1;
> > } else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "clearbadblocks")) {
> >- r = dust_clear_badblocks(dd);
> >+ r = dust_clear_badblocks(dd, result, maxlen, &sz);
> > } else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "quiet")) {
> > if (!dd->quiet_mode)
> > dd->quiet_mode = true;
> >@@ -441,7 +446,7 @@ static int dust_message(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv,
> > else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "removebadblock"))
> > r = dust_remove_block(dd, block);
> > else if (!strcasecmp(argv[0], "queryblock"))
> >- r = dust_query_block(dd, block);
> >+ r = dust_query_block(dd, block, result, maxlen, &sz);
> > else
> > invalid_msg = true;
> >
>
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-28 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 21:10 [PATCH v4 1/4] dm dust: report some message results back to user directly Bryan Gurney
2020-06-20 0:55 ` yangerkun
2020-06-28 1:08 ` yangerkun
2020-06-28 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200628150804.GA8779@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox