From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5514FC2D0E4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA93420729 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:40:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA93420729 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-378-g4ilYL2NOBa_Q77dkHZH0w-1; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:40:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: g4ilYL2NOBa_Q77dkHZH0w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21D58803F4B; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 045C65D9E3; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877F95002E; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AKKmBwT003364 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:48:11 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 62B69DAF2B; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE56F00E1 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB74F103B802 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com (mail-pl1-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-178-jUSCuYgcNzSCcCvgyZuXnw-1; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:48:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: jUSCuYgcNzSCcCvgyZuXnw-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id d17so5470096plr.5 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:48:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=v0uQ3+ZvQ790GJbfbb1ESqfRrqQ38XoL7hho1t1Gb0k=; b=CKQDanOo83chca8GY1Mm/pNA9mPHgPO0fWDwIovDw78clfep5YSRlqhdC7Wby59p70 vtyFkT9cOe7cAzRiXg4rJlhFj+7VgvgjrRMDq4RRVzIOXabEWGAFAp2B3ThC/xa0rwxs grvWjknk78Q+RauaCeMSqIvC5ZY9f/336G/uisbtO0j918Zpctga2cnI/+rzFfH11SMT QbJjelLirrSYlQNev+KunlIwduu2YIslAGjMeeqMstX7FnLMGlYszDmLxjhH+z/urnxZ 64f1zA1BUEz4FOH7+/O2/FYeGCKKHVPNVpsEw9LaDfVj1TVd922VsxgN25j7H3qXnmvW PpdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aoQmpBb6lSW+oOnhq9o6M8tM10rH4AK0+cbbwBx1WbsoqNv42 CqMN1SzSfELxMQiThcZyYo1hdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwusp2Lb+4OqT162rurUKkT/e5T3DAOLIduq4rICrKRG7vcFewdIWNkE66BLMZ+8SMrIPoLqA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7890:b029:d8:bb20:518e with SMTP id q16-20020a1709027890b02900d8bb20518emr15184915pll.66.1605905283037; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:48:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm565810pfi.162.2020.11.20.12.48.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:48:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:48:01 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Jakub Kicinski Message-ID: <202011201244.78E002D5@keescook> References: <20201120105344.4345c14e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <202011201129.B13FDB3C@keescook> <20201120115142.292999b2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201120115142.292999b2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:39:39 -0500 Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, GR-everest-linux-l2@marvell.com, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, Nick Desaulniers , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-geode@lists.infradead.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, drbd-dev@tron.linbit.com, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Joe Perches , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:30:40 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:21:39 -0600 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > > This series aims to fix almost all remaining fall-through warnings in > > > > order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang. > > > > > > > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, explicitly > > > > add multiple break/goto/return/fallthrough statements instead of just > > > > letting the code fall through to the next case. > > > > > > > > Notice that in order to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, this > > > > change[1] is meant to be reverted at some point. So, this patch helps > > > > to move in that direction. > > > > > > > > Something important to mention is that there is currently a discrepancy > > > > between GCC and Clang when dealing with switch fall-through to empty case > > > > statements or to cases that only contain a break/continue/return > > > > statement[2][3][4]. > > > > > > Are we sure we want to make this change? Was it discussed before? > > > > > > Are there any bugs Clangs puritanical definition of fallthrough helped > > > find? > > > > > > IMVHO compiler warnings are supposed to warn about issues that could > > > be bugs. Falling through to default: break; can hardly be a bug?! > > > > It's certainly a place where the intent is not always clear. I think > > this makes all the cases unambiguous, and doesn't impact the machine > > code, since the compiler will happily optimize away any behavioral > > redundancy. > > If none of the 140 patches here fix a real bug, and there is no change > to machine code then it sounds to me like a W=2 kind of a warning. I'd like to avoid splitting common -W options between default and W=2 just based on the compiler. Getting -Wimplicit-fallthrough enabled found plenty of bugs, so making sure it works correctly for both compilers feels justified to me. (This is just a subset of the same C language short-coming.) > I think clang is just being annoying here, but if I'm the only one who > feels this way chances are I'm wrong :) It's being pretty pedantic, but I don't think it's unreasonable to explicitly state how every case ends. GCC's silence for the case of "fall through to a break" doesn't really seem justified. -- Kees Cook -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel