From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Re: Problem w/ CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:23:13 +0200 Message-ID: <48BD3031.3090905@kernel.org> References: <48BD173B.3090600@hp.com> <48BD19B1.9040207@kernel.org> <48BD1BA5.1020604@hp.com> <48BD1E30.8040602@kernel.org> <20080902122006.GN15123@agk.fab.redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080902122006.GN15123@agk.fab.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jens Axboe List-Id: dm-devel.ids Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:06:24PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Well, dev_t is 32bits and MINORBITS is 20. So, major 12 bits, minor 20 >> bits, so 4 characters for major, 7 characters for minor. > > Upstream libdevmapper CVS patched - will appear in next release (1.02.28). Alright, thanks. What about the /proc/devices one? Would adding an entry help? I'm kind of lost /proc/devices. It's now mostly non-functional legacy stuff we've been carrying around. Is it deprecated or do we intend to keep it around forever? Ooh.. which also reminds me that I forgot to reserve the major number w/ lanana. Will do that. Thanks. -- tejun