Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dm core: reject I/O violating new queue limits
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:59:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F17F74.6010307@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F17510.7010805@ct.jp.nec.com>

Hi Kiyoshi,

Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> This patch detects requests violating the queue limitations
> and rejects them.
> 
> The same limitation checks are done when requests are submitted
> to the queue by blk_insert_cloned_request().
> However, such violation can happen if a table is swapped and
> the queue limitations are shrunk while some requests are
> in the queue.
> 
> Since struct request is a reliable one in the block layer and
> device drivers, dispatching such requests is pretty dangerous.
> (e.g. it may cause kernel panic easily.)
> So avoid to dispatch such problematic requests in request-based dm.
> 
This patch actually triggers accidentally during a no-paths scenario;
multipathing seems to flush all device details once all paths are gone,
so it'll fall back to the system defaults.
And then this check will trigger and kill all queued I/Os. Not good.

So either we fix device-mapper to keep the device details even for
the all-paths down scenario (basically we'd have to copy the device
details into the target_io structures and use that for comparison)
or we should rather not check here.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-24  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24  8:10 [PATCH 0/7] request-based dm-multipath (v2) Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm core: add core functions for request-based dm Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:45   ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-24  8:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] dm core: add integrity feature to " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:46   ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-24  8:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] dm core: enable " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-24  8:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] dm core: don't set QUEUE_ORDERED_DRAIN for " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:51   ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-24  8:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] dm core: reject I/O violating new queue limits Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:59   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2009-04-28  7:49     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-06-23  5:46       ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  8:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm core: disable interrupt when taking map_lock Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  9:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-24 11:50   ` Christof Schmitt
2009-04-24  8:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] dm-mpath: convert to request-based Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-24  9:04   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F17F74.6010307@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox