Linux Device Mapper development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
	snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
	paolo.valente-rcYM44yAMweonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org,
	fernando-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org,
	jmoyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	righi.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:37:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A5C35D7.1040502@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090713160352.GA3714-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:56:21AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi Vivek,
>>
>> This patch exports a cgroup based per group request limits interface.
>> and removes the global one. Now we can use this interface to perform
>> different request allocation limitation for different groups. 
>>
> 
> Thanks Gui. Few points come to mind.
> 
> - You seem to be making this as per cgroup limit on all devices. I guess
>   that different devices in the system can have different settings of
>   q->nr_requests and hence will probably want different per group limit.
>   So we might have to make it per cgroup per device limit.

  Yes, per cgroup per device limitation seems more reasonable. I'll see what
  i can do.

> 
> - There does not seem to be any checks for making sure that children
>   cgroups don't have more request descriptors allocated than parent group.

  Do we really need to make it hierarchical? IMHO, maintaining this limitation
  for cgroups independently is enough.

> 
> - I am re-thinking that what's the advantage of configuring request
>   descriptors also through cgroups. It does bring in additional complexity
>   with it and it should justfiy the advantages. Can you think of some?

  I'll try, but at least, this feature lets us be able to do more accurate
  limitation. :)

> 
>   Until and unless we can come up with some significant advantages, I will
>   prefer to continue to use per group limit through q->nr_group_requests
>   interface instead of cgroup. Once things stablize, we can revisit it and
>   see how this interface can be improved.

  I agree.

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-14  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-02 20:01 [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 01/25] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 02/25] io-controller: Core of the B-WF2Q+ scheduler Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 03/25] io-controller: bfq support of in-class preemption Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 04/25] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 05/25] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 06/25] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 07/25] io-controller: core bfq scheduler changes for hierarchical setup Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 08/25] io-controller: cgroup related changes for hierarchical group support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 09/25] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-06  2:46   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-06 14:16     ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]       ` <20090706141650.GD8279-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-07  1:40         ` [PATCH] io-controller: Get rid of css id from io cgroup Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:04           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 10/25] io-controller: cfq changes to use hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 11/25] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  2:16   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 14:00     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 12/25] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 13/25] io-controller: Wait for requests to complete from last queue before new queue is scheduled Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:09   ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 14/25] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 15/25] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 16/25] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 17/25] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 18/25] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 19/25] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 20/25] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-08-03  2:13   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  1:25     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 21/25] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  3:27   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-08 13:57     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-21  5:37   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-21  5:55     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-21 14:01       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-21 17:57         ` Nauman Rafique
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 22/25] io-controller: Per io group bdi congestion interface Vivek Goyal
2009-07-17  0:16   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-17 13:52     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 23/25] io-controller: Support per cgroup per device weights and io class Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 24/25] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-07-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 25/25] io-controller: experimental debug patch for async queue wait before expiry Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08  3:56 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Balbir Singh
2009-07-08 13:41   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-08 14:39     ` Balbir Singh
2009-07-09  1:58       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-10  1:56 ` [PATCH] io-controller: implement per group request allocation limitation Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-13 16:03   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-13 21:08     ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-07-14  7:45       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  2:00         ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:38           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04 22:37           ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]     ` <20090713160352.GA3714-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-07-14  7:37       ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-08-04  2:02   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:41     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-08-04  2:04   ` Munehiro Ikeda
2009-08-04  6:45     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-27  2:10 ` [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6 Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-27 12:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28  3:27     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-07-28  3:36       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-28 11:36     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-07-29  9:07     ` Gui Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A5C35D7.1040502@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng-bthxqxjhjhxqfuhtdcdx3a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=fernando-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jmoyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente-rcYM44yAMweonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=righi.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox