From: Douglas McClendon <dmc.fedora@filteredperception.org>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: trimmable dm-snapshot?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:16:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE0D9C0.9050801@filteredperception.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE0D02A.7070806@filteredperception.org>
Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21 2009 at 11:05pm -0400,
>> Douglas McClendon <dmc.fedora@filteredperception.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone looked into the idea of dm-snapshots responding
>>> appropriately to trims from filesystems?
>>>
>>> I.e. the efficiency problem of a dm-snapshotted ext filesystem
>>> having files created and then deleted? I.e. in such a scenario,
>>> resources in the cow device end up taken that could be freed if the
>>> dm layer could efficiently respond to trim notifications by
>>> discarding any useless exceptions?
>>>
>>> I've been poking around pondering whether an offline quick hack
>>> might be possible with libext2fs and enough knowledge of the on-disk
>>> persistent snapshot format. I.e. just walk the exception chunks in
>>> the cow device, use libext2fs (sufficient? easiest way?) to
>>> determine whether all the fsblocks/sectors the chunk contains are
>>> all currently unneeded, and if so reclaiming that space (possibly by
>>> relocating the last exception. I'm still a distance from truly
>>> grokking the on-disk format along with the rest of the dm-snapshot
>>> and exception-store code).
>>>
>>> Does any of this make sense? Been looked at? Seem like a
>>> reasonable avenue to pursue?
>>
>> The snapshot must faithfully maintain a copy of the origin's data
>> relative to a particular point in time. You can't use changes to the
>> origin (trim or any other change) to delete the exceptions that a
>> snapshot is already maintaining. That would invalidate the whole intent
>> of the snapshot.
>
> I wasn't asking about trimmable dm-snapshot-origin devices, only
> trimmable[1] dm-snapshot devices.
>
> Thinking about snapshot-origin devices, what you say is a valid reason
> why such optimization is not remotely easy (or feasible at all).
Actually, a way you might accomplish a corresponding optimization with
dm-snapshot-origin would be this-
- At filesystem mount time, a sequence of initial discard requests for
all unused portions of the filesystem is passed down to the block/dm
layer. Then, the dm-snapshot-origin code would know to never create an
exception for a chunk that is a subset of those regions.
-dmc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-22 3:05 trimmable dm-snapshot? Douglas McClendon
2009-10-22 14:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-10-22 21:35 ` Douglas McClendon
2009-10-22 22:16 ` Douglas McClendon [this message]
2009-10-23 1:02 ` Douglas McClendon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE0D9C0.9050801@filteredperception.org \
--to=dmc.fedora@filteredperception.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox