From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:42:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7E4A2D.2090309@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009010811001.23591@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
Hello,
On 09/01/2010 02:12 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> That may be true for request-based dm (I don't know).
Oh, okay, this part of thread was for request based dm, so I assumed
you were talking about it.
> But bio-based dm doesn't depend on it, I wrote it and I didn't rely on
> that.
If you look at the two patches for bio-based ones. The first one is
basically what you're talking about w/ s/barrier/flush/ renames and
dropping of -EOPNOTSUPP. It doesn't really change the mechanism much.
If you don't feel comfortable about the second one, we sure can
postpone it but it's still quite away from the next merge window and
what would be the point of delaying it?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1283162296-13650-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: make __blk_rq_prep_clone() copy most command flags Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:50 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 13:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 9:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: remove the WRITE_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1283162296-13650-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-08-30 13:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <20100830132836.GB5283@redhat.com>
2010-08-30 13:59 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <4C7BB932.1070405@kernel.org>
2010-08-30 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:42 ` [PATCH] block: initialize flush request with WRITE_FLUSH instead of REQ_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:45 ` [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <4C7BC942.7070703@kernel.org>
2010-08-30 19:08 ` [PATCH " Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <20100830190835.GA8458@redhat.com>
2010-08-30 21:28 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 13:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-08-31 13:14 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <4C7BD202.4040700@kernel.org>
2010-08-30 19:18 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <20100830194731.GA10702@redhat.com>
2010-09-01 10:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-01 11:20 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-01 12:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-01 12:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-01 12:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 15:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 15:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-01 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 18:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-02 3:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-02 10:24 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-02 15:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 15:26 ` [REGRESSION][BISECTED] virtio-blk serial attribute causes guest to hang [Was: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 4/5] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm] Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 15:44 ` Ryan Harper
2010-09-09 15:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 16:03 ` Ryan Harper
2010-09-09 17:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 18:35 ` Ryan Harper
2010-09-09 19:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 19:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 20:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 20:30 ` Ryan Harper
2010-09-09 21:00 ` [PATCH] virtio-blk: put request that was created to retrieve the device id Mike Snitzer
2010-09-09 21:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-17 14:58 ` Ryan Harper
2010-09-21 21:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-08 16:06 ` [2.6.36 REGRESSION] " Mike Snitzer
2010-10-09 1:41 ` [PATCH] " Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <1283162296-13650-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-09-01 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Mike Snitzer
2010-09-01 13:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C7E4A2D.2090309@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).