From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:49:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA482B1.5000005@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412164417.GA13890@infradead.org>
On 2011-04-12 18:44, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 02:58:46PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Supposedly it's faster to do it inline rather than punt the dispatch.
>> But that may actually not be true, if you have multiple plugs going (and
>> thus multiple contenders for the queue lock on dispatch). So lets play
>> it safe and punt to kblockd, we can always revisit this later.
>
> Note that this can be optimized further by adding a new helper that just
> queues up work on kblockd without taking the queue lock, e.g. adding a
> new
>
> void blk_run_queue_async(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> if (likely(!blk_queue_stopped(q)))
> queue_delayed_work(kblockd_workqueue, &q->delay_work, 0);
> }
>
> And replacing all
>
> __blk_run_queue(q, true);
>
> callers with that, at which point they won't need the queuelock any
> more.
I realize that, in fact it's already safe as long as you pass in 'true'
for __blk_run_queue(). Before I had rewritten it to move the running
out, so that makes the trick a little difficult. This afternoon I also
tested it and saw no noticable difference, but I'll probably just do it
anyway as it makes sense.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
2011-03-10 0:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging Mike Snitzer
2011-04-05 3:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 4:50 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 1:12 ` hch
2011-04-12 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44 ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-04-12 16:54 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50 ` hch
2011-04-15 4:26 ` hch
2011-04-15 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 7:25 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 8:33 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23 ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30 ` hch
2011-04-18 22:38 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:19 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:40 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-04-18 9:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59 ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA482B1.5000005@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox